| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0003485 | Spring engine | General | public | 2013-02-21 17:25 | 2013-03-15 12:47 | ||||
| Reporter | jK | ||||||||
| Assigned To | Kloot | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||||||
| Product Version | |||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
| Summary | 0003485: UnitIDs must be >=1 but are >=0 atm | ||||||||
| Description | unit id's [1, n] feature id's are [0, n) (could be made [1,n] too but there is no specific reason for that) So the negative part of a signed int can be used for features while positive part for units. | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Checked infolog.txt for Errors | |||||||||
| Attached Files |
| ||||||||
 Relationships |
 Notes |
|
|
Kloot (developer) 2013-02-21 18:25 Last edited: 2013-02-21 18:25 |
Can you give at least one good specific example of current code (engine and/or gadget/widget) that relies on unit IDs being in [1, n] rather than [0, n-1]...? Furthermore negative ID's are already reserved to identify build commands. |
| Notes |
| Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-02-21 17:25 | jK | New Issue | |
| 2013-02-21 17:25 | jK | Status | new => assigned |
| 2013-02-21 17:25 | jK | Assigned To | => Kloot |
| 2013-02-21 18:25 | Kloot | Note Added: 0009876 | |
| 2013-02-21 18:25 | Kloot | Note Edited: 0009876 | View Revisions |
| 2013-02-21 18:25 | Kloot | Status | assigned => feedback |
| 2013-02-22 01:32 | abma | Relationship added | related to 0003483 |
| 2013-03-15 12:47 | Kloot | Status | feedback => closed |
| 2013-03-15 12:47 | Kloot | Resolution | open => no change required |
| Issue History |