Page 1 of 1
Do you support Bush? v2
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 06:28
by SpikedHelmet
To prove BlackLiger wrong, I have created this second poll.
(FYI: BlackLiger claims that in the previous poll, the fact that the "NO" option was above the "YES" option led to some sort of bias against Bush.)
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 06:35
by Raign
No way in hell !
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 07:05
by Zoombie
There's still not a 'indifferent' selection.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 07:42
by LathanStanley
why do I even bother...
THIS IS A DAMN INTERNATIONAL BOARD! if US ONLY could vote on it, SUUUUUURE it'll be a "sign" or 14 year old videogame nerds...
urgh...
post it on something like
http://www.ford-trucks.com or something like
http://www.big-boards.com
both are probably the most populated messageboards on the net full of US members (excluding 4chan

which is just effin HUUUGE)
but yeah... try a poll in a respectable spot and we'll see what happens..
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 08:09
by Neddie
Respectable and all-American sadly do not go hand in hand on the internet, in my experience. Every forum I remain a member of is notably an international one - for good reason.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 10:18
by SpikedHelmet
Just proving a point that the placement of the options has no bearing on the outcome. I don't care about more excuses.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 12:16
by rattle

"Hells yeah!"
I voted yes again by the way, due to the same reasons as before.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 12:52
by BvDorp
It's just too easy to disaprove with Bush. You never have to make the decisions he had to, just saying he could've done better will make u vote 'no' here.
And there you are, not knowing what ur talking about, sitting in your lazy chair, being ignorant, and most of all, not participating in how to make things better.
That, my friends, sux.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 13:58
by pintle
Bush may have had to make some difficult choices, but he didnt have to allow the level of civillian casualties in Iraq that he did. I have numerous reasons for opposing his political agenda, but #1 on my list is he is a genocidal fast assist and repair kbot face
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 14:11
by BvDorp
Err.. IMO the 'choice' for casualties, if there was actually one to be made, was with the other side, aka. muslims etc.
After all, it's mostly them which do the civilian killing
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 14:18
by BlackLiger
Doing something like this INTENTIONALLY negates the concept I posted, because you're conciously putting YES first. Spiked, you know nothing about the psychology of these things.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 14:48
by rattle
People who know what they are going to vote aren't influenced by the order, only the clueless ones.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 14:50
by Decimator
Well, considering we can't vote for Bush anymore, I don't think that applies.
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 14:50
by Guessmyname
BlackLiger wrote:Doing something like this INTENTIONALLY negates the concept I posted, because you're conciously putting YES first. Spiked, you know nothing about the psychology of these things.
Does it really matter?
Posted: 14 Oct 2006, 15:14
by SwiftSpear
No duplicate posts. Polls are useless anyways.