Page 1 of 2
4K!?! Are you serious!?!
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 18:04
by esteroth12
OK... why are the avatars limited to such abysmally low sizes? even AIM allows larger avs! can we please have 10, 15K avatars? its not like everyone has a 100K sig to slow you down, and almost everyone these days has DSL/Cable, if you don't, well... do we have to cater to the few without? 150K isn't that much data anyway, even for Dial-up...
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 18:11
by Acidd_UK
Maybe we don't all want to be spammed with animated gif avatars? I think 4k is fine... I like the forums loading nice and quickly. Plus, who pays for foum bandwidth? I imagine could soon add up to a lot of b/w...
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 18:15
by esteroth12
then could we have the ability to refer our avatar to another url? when you upload from url, the forums saves it as an image... why doesn't it just use the url's bandwidth? plenty of free hosts out there who could pay for the bandwidth
also, the size didn't stop Kixxe/Andreask...
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 18:54
by aGorm
4 is quite enough...
aGorm
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 19:16
by Snipawolf
Yeah, megabytes.. lol
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 21:05
by BlackLiger
I'd prefer 10k, it'd cost me less of the quality of some images I want to use instead of this older commander.
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 21:37
by KDR_11k
I've had a lot of trouble making this image small enough to work as an avatar. Even if it was just 8k we could use the full color range of a JPG or GIF. If you don't like animated gifs just disable them in your browser, that's what I did.
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 21:55
by Zenka
I would like a little more image size as well (8 or 10k will do). Why are animated GIF's a big no-no? Everyone admired aGorm's Spring eating smily ^.^
Posted: 17 Sep 2006, 22:23
by Erom
The current size is more than plenty. The avatar is not meant to showcase your works of art, it's just an identifying mark.
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 01:58
by LOrDo
Bigger the better, but I don't really care, 15 kilobytes isnt all that much.
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 02:22
by Caydr
Yes it is. Imagine 15 people posting on a page, each with their own 15 kb avatar. 225 kilobytes!
I'd like to see the maximum dimensions increased to 100x100 though maybe, and 5 kb.
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 04:48
by Neddie
Erom wrote:The current size is more than plenty. The avatar is not meant to showcase your works of art, it's just an identifying mark.
That's rather insulting, considering I did avatar art for over a year, sir.
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 15:04
by aGorm
5 kb would admitadly make all mine that bit better, but you can still do loads with 4kb! Or I can any way...
aGorm
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 22:40
by Snipawolf
Speaking of avatars, thats a pretty good one aGorm

Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 23:15
by aGorm
Thanks... Jsut trying to prove a point
aGorm
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 23:25
by Kixxe
MY AVATAR IS A DIRECT PROTEST AND TO SHOW YOU JUST HOW ANNOYING I CAN BE WITHIN THE RULESET OF YOUR PUNY SISSY RULES.
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 23:27
by aGorm
Much prefered your old one kixxe...
aGorm
Posted: 19 Sep 2006, 23:44
by Orakio
hahaha I thought you were talking about commander metal.
Posted: 20 Sep 2006, 00:26
by Weaver
Look this ones nice and under 4k.
Posted: 20 Sep 2006, 10:40
by NOiZE
Kixxe wrote:MY AVATAR IS A DIRECT PROTEST AND TO SHOW YOU JUST HOW ANNOYING I CAN BE WITHIN THE RULESET OF YOUR PUNY SISSY RULES.
fail