Page 1 of 2
No1 cares about the new ipod touch; dont post about it!
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 20:04
by Lippy
Only cos I don't have the money to buy 1...
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 20:19
by nemppu
hi here is very good artikle about ipod))))))i agree))))))
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=iphone
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 21:15
by KDR_11k
What's all that iPod hype about anyway?
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 21:21
by Sleksa
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 21:46
by Lippy
Erm Sleska, I think you missed the point. The ipod touch was announced today;
http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/05/ipod ... -official/
http://www.engadget.com/2007/09/05/ipod ... -hands-on/
Basically its an iphone, without the phone.
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 21:52
by Sleksa
Basically its an iphone, without the phone.
so its a phone without the phone? or like Iphone without the phone leaving just I?
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 22:00
by tombom
oh man paying £300 for the letter i is so exciting
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 22:05
by ralphie
Oh wow look it's another apple "i" gadget. I guess they're pretty happy to milk it for all they can, while they can.
Meanwhile i'll be sticking to my
Creative Zen
Posted: 05 Sep 2007, 23:21
by rattle
iPods are expensive crap by default. :P
Meanwhile i'll be sticking to my Creative Zen
Ditto.
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 03:14
by REVENGE
rattle wrote:iPods are expensive crap by default.
Meanwhile i'll be sticking to my Creative Zen
Ditto.
Fuck, they need to update it, I want WiFi on my Zen NOW!
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 13:09
by KDR_11k
tombom wrote:oh man paying £300 for the letter i is so exciting
Wheel of Fortune!
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 16:09
by AF
if you take the phone bits out of a nokia phone you get a pod, and if you add an apple logo it becomes an ipod
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 17:04
by Sleksa
here is my non-biased evaluation, which maddox kindly put into a picture and printed on the internet
now which one did you want again?
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 18:01
by hunterw
apple more like crapple
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 19:03
by rattle
Damn right. Sleska, put them on imagefag to conserve poor maddox' bandwidth. :P
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 21:43
by Neddie
Maddox doesn't care.
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 23:29
by Caydr
Alright, here's my golden opportunity to bitch. I've wanted to say something about this for the longest time, but always been too lazy. But here it is.
WHAT THE **** KIND OF DUMBASS REVIEWER ACTUALLY TAKES THE QUALITY OF THE PACK-IN EARPHONES INTO THE EQUATION WHEN THEY'RE SCORING AN MP3 PLAYER??? WHAT GIVES? PACK-INS ARE INTENDED TO SUCK, THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE DESIGNED FOR.
The answer?! EVERYONE. Especially CNET since that's the only place I've looked.
For crap sake, what kind of dumbassclown is going to actually use the pack-in earphones that come with something? They probably have herpes. One thing I don't need is ear herpes. I don't want ear herpes, and I don't want tinny sound.
If you guys want a pair of proper earphones, search your local e-tailer for "Creative Noise Cancelling Earphones". They're great, really... You can hear the sound when they move against something, like... I mean when the cord moves around... you know what I mean? But that doesn't really happen much.
Posted: 06 Sep 2007, 23:30
by erasmus
i own a trekstor vibez ^^
Posted: 07 Sep 2007, 00:44
by rattle
For crap sake, what kind of dumbassclown is going to actually use the pack-in earphones that come with something?
The earphones which came with my Zen were rather good.
Posted: 07 Sep 2007, 00:50
by SwiftSpear
The earbuds that come with the zen are quite tolerable. They might not cut it for a hardcore audiophile, but I doubt the ipod earbuds would fair much better to that crowd.
