I did not mean to be authorative. However, I think if something falls below the expectations of the person designated to maintain it and its reputation, it may place the future of said object into question. I believe it would be better to be safe than sorry in this case.Johannes wrote:And how would a site being made somehow piss them off, unless it somehow was really, really awfully made?Ultimately, a website which does not meet the satisfaction of Bob and Beherith will not be a website worth having.
The issue is not so much if a site can exist, rather, does its existance serve a worthwhile purpose and will it stand the test of time?
In my opinion a worthwhile purpose is a site which will provide information with regard to BA in the future and be of a good standard. It is also of importance to be curtious with regards to the overarching opinions and goals of the mod's maintainers. This would preferably come in the form of official support, trust or endorsement.
If you make a site without clear and objective support you are going it solo and at such a time, although there is potential for support from higher powers, you can no longer be certain. This may lead to confrontation in future: inevitably or unintentinally, one person's ideas may conflict with another and at this point scenarios similar to those in which AF "got burnt" by in the past by may arise again.