Page 5 of 24
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 08:41
by Neddie
I propose that the sequential ratification of any two motions generated or nominated by the same person in each case results in the addition of many, specifically twenty, points to Peet's total.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 09:14
by lurker
I like it, but where's the rhyme?
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 09:18
by Neddie
Generated - Nominated
Many - Twenty (Approximate)
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 09:49
by lurker
Okay. I saw that but wasn't sure, being partly asleep and biased more to rhythm.
Proposal:
When a post has been made,
a valid thought for debate,
even if it has died,
no one need be afraid,
to nominate and persuade.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 10:24
by KDR_11k
(I have no idea what the hell Lurker just said, can we mark his post as dead?)
Proposal:
Rhyme shall henceforth refer to ASCII art. Because making stuff up is just too hard.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 13:41
by lurker
paraphrasing:
When a post has been made
(a valid proposal)
even if it's dead
you can nominate it.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 13:50
by KDR_11k
k, then I'll nominate that.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:04
by SwiftSpear
I can't accept the validity of that proposal, it's in direct conflict with rule 107
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:22
by KDR_11k
No, rule 107 does not state what "dead" means. No rule forces that a dead proposal cannot be revived.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:27
by SwiftSpear
KDR_11k wrote:No, rule 107 does not state what "dead" means. No rule forces that a dead proposal cannot be revived.
That was the fault of my incomplete definitions table, not the rules. Fixed now.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:41
by Felix the Cat
Proposal:
Because we are so wily,
each post must end in smiley.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:45
by rattle
Nay to smileys.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:51
by Felix the Cat
Request for rules clarification:
If you are the one who submitted a winning proposal, are you considered to be "on the victor's side"?
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:51
by SinbadEV
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Sugar is Sweet,
I Propose that "When a proposal is nominated for vote, A second proposal of the nominating parties choosing may be included as part of the motion, such that the motion, should it be accepted, will bring two new rules (or two separate addendum to a current rule, or any combination thereof) into play... too."
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:53
by KDR_11k
I hereby propose transmogrification of rule 107.
Which obviously is not rule 11.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:55
by SwiftSpear
Felix the Cat wrote:Request for rules clarification:
If you are the one who submitted a winning proposal, are you considered to be "on the victor's side"?
No, as per the rules you can vote against your own proposal, and it's actually beneficial for you to do so point wise
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 20:59
by Felix the Cat
I nominate KDR's proposal.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 21:06
by SwiftSpear
A vote is in action. All proposals are now dead.
Motion 307: transmogrification of rule 107
Proposed by: KDR_11k
Any poster may vote either for or against the current motion. If the motion passes it will become a rule. A player voting for a passed motion will
receive 10 points, a player voting against a failed motion will receive 10 points. The first side to reach 4 votes wins.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 21:07
by Felix the Cat
I vote against Motion 307.
Re: Nomic 3
Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 21:13
by SinbadEV
I vote against motion 307.