Spring RTS Engine

Vote 316 has been rejected.

Player rankings:
lurker - 65 (proposed: rule 209, 216) {10}
KDR-11k - 20 {3} (proposed: rule 215
Peet - 30 {4}
Decimator - 10 {2}
SinbadEV - 70 (proposed: rule 211){7}
neddiedrow - 75 {8}
aegis - 110 (proposed: rule 205, rule 210) {11}
Felix the Cat - 70(proposed: rule 206) {8}
Erom - 20 {2}
nemppu - 40 {4}(proposed: rule 213)
manored - 20{2}
Ixoran - 30 {3}
SwiftSpear the rhymey - -100

Current list of mutable rules:

• 201 - Every vote in which a player is on the victor's side (the vote the player issued was the same as the winning vote) that player shall receive 10 points and the player whose vote decides which is the victors side, will have the 10 points due him summarily denied
• 202 - While no player has 500 points or greater the game will continue
• 203 - The player who has been on the victor's side the highest number of times at the end of the game is the winner
• 204 - The game will end when there is no rule requiring it's continuation
• 205 - To win the game, a player must have originally submitted one of the current game's rules in a proposal during the current game
• 206 - All posts by a Judge must be in hot pink, color code #FF0080
• 208 - To make the game a little more fun, every voting period a poster can have a valid vote numbering only at 1
• 209 - Swiftspear the rhymey, despite not being a player, has as of this post a score of -100 for interpreting rule 108 in a loose way so to exclude votes.
• 210 - if a player nominates a proposal then votes against it and it fails to pass, they gain 5 additional points and the original submitter of the proposal loses 5 points. (prop: aegis)
• 211 - When a proposal is nominated for vote, A second existing proposal of the nominating parties choosing may be included as part of the motion (such that the motion, should it be accepted, will bring two new rules or two separate addendum to a current rule or any combination thereof into play) (prop: SinbadEV)
• 212 - If a vote is initiated, all proposals are dead, all nominations are dead, old nominations must be created new at the end of the vote, new nominations may not be issued until the vote is complete
• 213 - to all judge's posts an image added, of a chicken, fried.(prop: nemppu)
• 214 - The player currently leading in victorious votes shall be given the title of "numpty", and to liven the game, this title must be always used in reference to the player and at the end of his post, so he is abused. ALSO: In the interest of charity, whenever a player casts one of the (up to 7) valid votes for or against a motion, they must specify another active player to nominate for promotion. Each of these nominations must contain a title and can be enacted by a different player seconding the nomination during the period between a proposals acceptance and the opening of the next round of voting. To avoid confusion the titles will be granted in an additional post by the judge following the start of a vote for a motion. Valid Titles must be chosen from This Article. An active player is a player who has posted in the thread at least once.
• 215 - A proposal must never change its effect between creation and being put into effect, e.g. the people affected by it must be determined by actions taking place before the proposition or after it takes effect. (prop: KDR_11k)
• 216 - A player may issue their vote outside of a designated voting period, if they list a specific nomination whose motion-to-be they are voting for. To be fair to all, the nominator cannot be the first to vote in this way. (prop: lurker)

We are back on proposal time.

Proposal:
Any proposal that contains the letter "q" is invalid.

What happened to rhyming.

Rhyming is no longer mandatory, per se.
Felix's proposal went through the other day.

Proposal: No post with a word count that is not prime is allowed to affect the game.

I nominate Felix's proposal and attach mine.

Proposal:
Any proposal that contains the letter "q" is invalid. No post with a word count that is not prime is allowed to affect the game.

I vote nay to Felix's proposal with KDRs attachment and nomination and nominate KDR for the title of Certified Fraud Examiner.

I vote yes for KDR's irritating masterpiece, and nominate rattle for Master Warrant Officer.

I vote yes and nominate Saktoth for Quaestor, reminding him to take his dried frog pills.

I vote yes and nominate KDR for the title of Ph.D.

I vote nay because I can't turn it into a paradox and nominate Peet to the title of Gauleiter.

I vote nay out of spite and nominate Saktoth for the title of Decemivr.

Proposal: Any proposal that contains the letter "q" is invalid. No post with a word count that is not prime is allowed to affect the game.

You guys forgot you must quote then pre-voting...

I vote no and nominate KDR_11k for the tittle of "Anyoing"

Titles
Peet - Nanny
nemppu - Mother Superior
Lurker - Indlovuzaki (Great She-Elephant)
KDR_11k - Gentlewoman of the Bedchamber
Felix - Rear-Admiral

A vote is in action. All proposals are now dead.

Motion 317: Any proposal that contains the letter "q" is invalid. AND: No post with a word count that is not prime is allowed to affect the game.

Proposed by: Felix the Cat

Any poster may vote either for or against the current motion. If the motion passes it will become a rule. A player voting for a passed motion will

receive 10 points, a player voting against a failed motion will receive 10 points. The first side to reach 4 votes wins.

Current Votes: Nay - 2 (manored, Saktoth)


"poster" is defined the same way it's defined for a spring user. If you're on our forums, flaming our users, I'm going to ban your account, your IP, and your email address, and then any account that seems suspiciously aware of your situation without ceeding any difference to your motives as well. A moderator is the judge remember.[/quote]

I vote nay and nominate Peet to receive the title of Earl

Ãś repeat my vote for yes and nominating Saktoth for Quaestor.

I vote nay and nominate Saktoth for the title of Don.

edit: accidentally inserted a g after don, removed, typo

You don't have to quote when prevoting.
I just did that at first because I felt like it.
I listed that I was voting specifically for KDR's sole nomination.
I demand my vote be counted.

Edit: And wtf are you doing counting manored's vote? "Annoying" isn't on that list of titles.

Well "if they list a specific nomination whose motion-to-be they are voting for" its quite unclear :) The judge probally should fix it with his interpretation.

And thats wiki... If the tittle is not there, I can put it there :)

Anyway I Vote no again and nominate KDR_11k for the tittle of "Member of the Legislative Assembly"