Spring RTS Engine

Jazcash wrote:How do you create life from non-life? Life that knows how to breed and how to develop and evolve can't come from nothing, can it?

Actually...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPE2CnTh ... re=recentf

This might change your mind.

every other species starts out with species who can reproduce with each other, but are all of the sudden unwilling, sexual patterns not working anymore, followed by sterile offspring, then gentical incompatibility. I dont say that we were close to that by moar then 5- 10k years, but still, pretty close. Now we merge again, and if genetic engineering becomes comon place, we will split after that.

I will have zelda ears for me, and that blue hair lafiel had in crest of the stars. Actually skin wich i can colour adjust by myself would also be cool. Racism will be pretty comon, or eradicated if we can get that neurons that limit us to group thinking to evolve.

Jazcash wrote:How do you create life from non-life? Life that knows how to breed and how to develop and evolve can't come from nothing, can it?

Its given birth by chance, if you throw some eggs, some milk, flour and sugar into the air, and do so for a billion, gagillion, fafillion, shabolubalu million illion yillion times, you actually get three delicious cakes, who are moist, and reproduce moar cake.

Jazcash wrote:How do you create life from non-life? Life that knows how to breed and how to develop and evolve can't come from nothing, can it?

It happened on the 20th May, 2010. Google it (and anyone else who is interested)

Amazing that the famous troll got you all into a flame war. I also find it amazing that the militant atheists are arguing that a certain guy wrote a book that they don't even believe existence in the first. Hypocritical or ironic? I never know.

God is just moar fun to bash at, its like rebelling against a father, not just against some boring brainbugs, wich if we battled again, we would see reapear after the defeat of the believers, in our midst as the holy prophet Dawkins wrote into his famous book... and so on.. and so on.

And Jazcash is not just trollin, i mean insane idea and get it sticky, that is one thing, but this isnt really escalating into a flamewar, just sort of a solarflare of arguments, nothing really emotional. Sun im dissapoint.

PS: I┬┤m downloadin pron right now, so everything written beyond this line is just fapcrap.
_____________________________________________________________
I drew a line, to burry moar, than just one attentionwhore.

Dose anyone notices that the majority in this thread made a lot of claims and yet never seemed to provided with citations?

zwzsg wrote:No, he was man. Making himself worshipped as a god is called idolatry, and the Bible itself says that is punishable by death. If the Bible says Jesus Christ is guilty, then it is just like as if God says Jesus Christ is guilty, for the Bible is nothing but the words of God. Who are you to contest the law of God?

You don't know very much about Christianity do you? I assuming that you only know that they go around and "blowing up" stuff, and other hateful stuff that your brethren teaches you.

Best thing is wikipedia is on our side

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusade
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquistador

There is more, and the same goes for other religion. And yes, those are true believers, after all they just dont take one or two sentences out of context by there own choice&tradition, instead keep the whole 99.9% of bloody murderous preaching in good faith. The problem is not taking there arguments apart, even in middair, it is that you archieve nothing by that work, thats why people dont back it up. Believers dont read footnotes, hell they dont even read there own book.

And now for the positiv side of the whole thing. After the pill has hit the demographics of most of the western societys, it are bubbles of religious fanatics who provide from the inside (US-Version)- or refugeestreams from the outside (European-Experiment) new fuel for the enlightning engine. So this seemingly useless thread, has a purpose at last.

PicassoCT wrote:Best thing is wikipedia is on our side

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusade
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquistador

There is more, and the same goes for other religion. And yes, those are true believers, after all they just dont take one or two sentences out of context by there own choice&tradition, instead keep the whole 99.9% of bloody murderous preaching in good faith. The problem is not taking there arguments apart, even in middair, it is that you archieve nothing by that work, thats why people dont back it up. Believers dont read footnotes, hell they dont even read there own book.

And now for the positiv side of the whole thing. After the pill has hit the demographics of most of the western societys, it are bubbles of religious fanatics who provide from the inside (US-Version)- or refugeestreams from the outside (European-Experiment) new fuel for the enlightning engine. So this seemingly useless thread, has a purpose at last.

1.No true Scotsman.
2.You guys keep focusing all the bad stuff and never the good stuff.
3.Religion never causes bad things to happen. Influence? Maybe. But directly cause it? No.
4. Christianity 500 years ago is not the exactly the same Christianity today.
5. I read the link that you list to the city bombings and I didn't read anything about christaintiy.
6.No wikipedia isn't on anyone side. Keep dreaming.
7.Hey you too quote things out of content.

Yeah, i do, but i dont claim to have a moral superiority just because i overthink the information flowin g into my brain.
http://news.oneindia.in/2010/05/15/fatl ... speed.html

Tired. GOod night.

Super Mario wrote:Amazing that the famous troll got you all into a flame war. I also find it amazing that the militant atheists are arguing that a certain guy wrote a book that they don't even believe existence in the first. Hypocritical or ironic? I never know.

I think you confused yourself there.

Super Mario wrote:

zwzsg wrote:No, he was man. Making himself worshipped as a god is called idolatry, and the Bible itself says that is punishable by death. If the Bible says Jesus Christ is guilty, then it is just like as if God says Jesus Christ is guilty, for the Bible is nothing but the words of God. Who are you to contest the law of God?

You don't know very much about Christianity do you? I assuming that you only know that they go around and "blowing up" stuff, and other hateful stuff that your brethren teaches you.

Should someone who "knows about christianity" follow the teachings of christianity? Why should we ignore god's words in the old testament? At the very least it shows god's fallibility that he had to rewrite his own rules. Then he rewrote them again in the Koran... no wait.

I whoreship the wholy book of spring, manifested out of the code written by the gods, told to the devs, praise be upon them, to become a game. I find it highly insulting that you travell across the web, to start a flamewar over religion, in the boards that is the inner sanctum of mine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJRxsnwQww

watch this part of the richard dawkins documentary.

I want to punch that stupid evangelical retard in the face.

"The bible dusnt contradict itself" i lold hard then he started raging cos he knew richard dawkins was going to own him hard.

Otherside wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJRxsnwQww

watch this part of the richard dawkins documentary.

I want to punch that stupid evangelical retard in the face.

"The bible dusnt contradict itself" i lold hard then he started raging cos he knew richard dawkins was going to own him hard.

He might as well watch the entire documentary.

Otherside wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXJRxsnwQww

Some woman going on about how not all people's DNA is a double helix, that some people have 4 triangles of DNA pointing inwards.
I could genuinely see dawkins' eyebrow rising into his forehead as she spoke ;D

Edit: Wow some guy just said: "remarkably nobody knows the structure of liquid water"

Well i guess i have made the scientific breakthrough of the century then!

wow that guy looks scary. i would shit in my pants if he talked to me face to face. srsly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkhQLt1v ... re=related

Hahah. That one is golden.

It's amazing how science can cure diseases, smash the atom and create nuclear explosions, yet be so wrong about everything that is mentioned in the Holy Bible

Yeah amazing isn't it. So let me get this correct, based on science we can create all these wonderful tools like computers and stuff, but it can't prove or disprove Ukko Ylijumala (ancient god worshipped in finland before christianity spread, known as Thor in scandinavia). Ukko Ylijumala clearly said in folklore he created rain and we can certainly see rain happening every now and then, so science must be wrong! Checkmate atheists.

If you atheists keep multiplying Zeus is gonna release the Titans again.