Nomic 3 - Page 15

Nomic 3

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Re: Nomic 3

Post by manored »

Hum, should have tough that proposal better :)
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Felix the Cat »

I second SinbadEV's nomination of Peet for the title of Nanny.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Re: Nomic 3

Post by rattle »

Rhymes are lame
and so is this game.

Tell me when there's a tl;dr nomic up.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SwiftSpear »

Image
A vote is in action. All proposals are now dead.

Motion 315: A proposal must never change its effect between creation and being put into effect, e.g. the people affected by it must be determined by actions taking place before the proposition or after it takes effect.

Proposed by: KDR_11k

Any poster may vote either for or against the current motion. If the motion passes it will become a rule. A player voting for a passed motion will

receive 10 points, a player voting against a failed motion will receive 10 points. The first side to reach 4 votes wins.
User avatar
lurker
Posts: 3842
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: Nomic 3

Post by lurker »

Why is your post contained in a quote?

I vote yea.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SwiftSpear »

Image
It's too much effort to copy and past a tonne of stuff new each time, so I quote the last rule post so I don't have to go to the trouble of getting everything in an all text format, or pulling it from a notepad file. I just keep forgetting to remove the quote lines after I do the editing
User avatar
aegis
Posts: 2456
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 17:47

Re: Nomic 3

Post by aegis »

I vote yes and nominate Peet to the title of Lurker.

--numpty
Last edited by aegis on 22 Apr 2008, 15:34, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
nemppu
Posts: 417
Joined: 25 Jun 2007, 22:27

Re: Nomic 3

Post by nemppu »

I vote yes and I nominate aegis to receive the title of Earl
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Felix the Cat »

I vote yes and nominate nemppu for the title of Mother Superior.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Nomic 3

Post by KDR_11k »

I vote yes and second Felix's title nomination.

EDIT: and I nominate Lurker for Indlovuzaki (translates as Great She Elephant)
Last edited by KDR_11k on 22 Apr 2008, 09:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
lurker
Posts: 3842
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: Nomic 3

Post by lurker »

For my yea vote, I nominate SinbadEV for Ban. I also remind KDR that a seconding is not sufficient.
User avatar
Neddie
Community Lead
Posts: 9406
Joined: 10 Apr 2006, 05:05

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Neddie »

I vote yes and nominate Lurker for the title of Combat Submersible.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Nomic 3

Post by KDR_11k »

lurker wrote:I nominate SinbadEV for Ban.
I second that.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SwiftSpear »

Image

Vote 313 has been accepted.

Player rankings:
lurker - 50 (proposed: rule 209) {7}
KDR-11k - 5 {2} (proposed: rule 215
Peet - 30 {3}
Decimator - 10 {2}
SinbadEV - 70 (proposed: rule 211){7}
neddiedrow - 75 {7}
aegis - 100 (proposed: rule 205, rule 207, rule 210) {10}
Felix the Cat - 50(proposed: rule 206) {6}
Erom - 20 {2}
nemppu - 20 {2}(proposed: rule 213)
manored - 20{2}
Ixoran - 30 {3}
SwiftSpear the rhymey - -100

Current list of mutable rules:
  • 201 - Every vote in which a player is on the victor's side (the vote the player issued was the same as the winning vote) that player shall receive 10 points and the player whose vote decides which is the victors side, will have the 10 points due him summarily denied
  • 202 - While no player has 500 points or greater the game will continue
  • 203 - The player who has been on the victor's side the highest number of times at the end of the game is the winner
  • 204 - The game will end when there is no rule requiring it's continuation
  • 205 - To win the game, a player must have originally submitted one of the current game's rules in a proposal during the current game
  • 206 - All posts by a Judge must be in hot pink, color code #FF0080
  • 207 - Proposals must contain rhyme
  • 208 - To make the game a little more fun, every voting period a poster can have a valid vote numbering only at 1
  • 209 - Swiftspear the rhymey, despite not being a player, has as of this post a score of -100 for interpreting rule 108 in a loose way so to exclude votes.
  • 210 - if a player nominates a proposal then votes against it and it fails to pass, they gain 5 additional points and the original submitter of the proposal loses 5 points. (prop: aegis)
  • 211 - When a proposal is nominated for vote, A second existing proposal of the nominating parties choosing may be included as part of the motion (such that the motion, should it be accepted, will bring two new rules or two separate addendum to a current rule or any combination thereof into play) (prop: SinbadEV)
  • 212 - If a vote is initiated, all proposals are dead, all nominations are dead, old nominations must be created new at the end of the vote, new nominations may not be issued until the vote is complete
  • 213 - to all judge's posts an image added, of a chicken, fried.(prop: nemppu)
  • 214 - The player currently leading in victorious votes shall be given the title of "numpty", and to liven the game, this title must be always used in reference to the player and at the end of his post, so he is abused. ALSO: In the interest of charity, whenever a player casts one of the (up to 7) valid votes for or against a motion, they must specify another active player to nominate for promotion. Each of these nominations must contain a title and can be enacted by a different player seconding the nomination during the period between a proposals acceptance and the opening of the next round of voting. To avoid confusion the titles will be granted in an additional post by the judge following the start of a vote for a motion. Valid Titles must be chosen from This Article. An active player is a player who has posted in the thread at least once.
  • 215 - A proposal must never change its effect between creation and being put into effect, e.g. the people affected by it must be determined by actions taking place before the proposition or after it takes effect. (prop: KDR_11k)


We are back on proposal time.

User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Nomic 3

Post by KDR_11k »

What about the titles?

Edit: Okay, so seconding must be done after the vote is over... I second Felix's title for nemppu.
User avatar
lurker
Posts: 3842
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: Nomic 3

Post by lurker »

In times of old, proposals lie.
I say, "Let them no longer die."
The spector of death shall come to them no more.
But their nominators must quote, or be shown the door.

(This is a modification of 212. Note that you only need to quote a proposal if it's not from the current cycle.)
Last edited by lurker on 23 Apr 2008, 08:07, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Nomic 3

Post by KDR_11k »

lurker wrote:In times of old, proposals lie.
I say, "Let them no longer die."
The spector of death shall come to them no more.
But their nominators must quote, or be shown the door.

(note that you only need to quote a proposal if it's not from the current cycle)
nomination'd
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Re: Nomic 3

Post by manored »

I would like the judge to clarify his understanding of this proposal then he starts the vote.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Re: Nomic 3

Post by rattle »

Request denied.
manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Re: Nomic 3

Post by manored »

rattle wrote:Request denied.
Ok then, dont complain then I dont quote my nomination and then complain "but I even made a formal apresentation between my nomination and the door!" :)
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”