Page 2 of 2

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 00:53
by manored
Hellspawn wrote:Whats wrong with porcing? Winning by porcing seems to me as valid as any other tactic.
It is, but some people dont like porcers because in most mods they finish up losing and make the game last 10x more due to excessive defenses.

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 03:35
by LordMatt
Win by porcing is an oxymoron.

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 04:47
by Ishach
Porcing is a winning strategy if you know why you are porcing

If you are just indefinitely building more and more defence with no strategy to reach the end result (winning) then its a losing strategy.

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 09:49
by Hellspawn
Indeed, expanding porcing especially on smaller map can be sometimes very effective. Of course you have units aswell. It just means you don spam units but invest a lot in static defense aswell.

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 15:02
by DemO

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 16:53
by Tim-the-maniac
Man did I pick a bad time to browse the forum :x :( :|

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 17:00
by manored
Ishach wrote:Porcing is a winning strategy if you know why you are porcing

If you are just indefinitely building more and more defence with no strategy to reach the end result (winning) then its a losing strategy.

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 18:24
by DemO
Tim-the-maniac wrote:Man did I pick a bad time to browse the forum :x :( :|
??

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 18:29
by Peet
You don't want to know...

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 21:20
by hunterw
seems to work pretty good, those llts get a pretty hefty benefit from altitude, and there is plenty for the taking on that map.