Page 2 of 2

Posted: 29 Jan 2007, 23:13
by 1v0ry_k1ng
If only everyone had a win:lose ratio

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 00:07
by Neddie
1v0ry_k1ng wrote:If only everyone had a win:lose ratio
That isn't accurate, due to the prevalence of stacking and/or sympathetic joining. I know I try to join teams where they are massively underpowered in many games.

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 06:39
by Lolsquad_Steven
More ranks imo.

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 06:50
by Candleman
It'd be nice to have a rating system where after each game you rate the people you played with. The problem is, this is only possible with an honest playerbase.

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 13:32
by Lolsquad_Steven
We should rank people kinda like the military imo, if you want to get a promotion you have to kiss the right arse.

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 14:19
by Deathblane
We either need a ladder or more ranks.

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 16:51
by rattle
Lolsquad_Steven wrote:We should rank people kinda like the military imo, if you want to get a promotion you have to kiss the right arse.
The wrong one might get you into deep shit.

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 17:35
by 1v0ry_k1ng
urgh.
I like the win:lose better

Posted: 30 Jan 2007, 19:58
by smoth
I play win or lose and if someone gets the best of me I congratulate them. I even watch the replay(if the game has one) to see how they kicked my @$$.

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 00:13
by Deathblane
Yeah but you're not 13

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 05:09
by Neddie
Candleman wrote:It'd be nice to have a rating system where after each game you rate the people you played with. The problem is, this is only possible with an honest playerbase.
Why not?

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 05:36
by Candleman
I'm saying there are far too many rage-quits and easily angerable people who play Spring to rate players honestly. Clanmembers would have very high ratings due to playing with each other and therefore better ratings, and many people would be underrated simply for accidentally angering a speedmetaller. Among other things.

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 05:46
by BigSteve
There's nothing funnier or more satisfying than beating on somebody (non noob) so bad that they rage quit ^^

Me? when I lose I take it like a man! slaute the victor and go down with my ship!

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 06:46
by smoth
yeah I'll give steve that. He and I have differences but he is a good player.

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 06:47
by smoth
yeah I'll give steve that. He and I have differences but he is a good player.

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 09:02
by Ishach
I never really care about teams, stacked for or against me I just take satisfaction from how I personally played. Although I do prefer 1v1 in any place its possible.

Posted: 31 Jan 2007, 14:04
by 1v0ry_k1ng
If my team is a sack of lol then I just fight like he-man until the very last stand with my boi surrounded by DT and fortwalls in the top corner of the map

Posted: 02 Feb 2007, 03:03
by Lolsquad_Steven
Yeah more ranks would be awesome.

Posted: 02 Feb 2007, 05:43
by Muzic
+1.

Though TAspring ranks usually mean nothing. My star is made of plastic =\.

Sometimes the 'younger' ( newer ) players can get all whiny about having 1 more star on the other team. I believe the imbalance was exactly just 1 more star and he start to yell at me and told me I was stacking the game. Host got mad and kicked the whiner..

Posted: 02 Feb 2007, 18:07
by Doombringer
I think most games are good balanced just like TA spring.