Page 2 of 2
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 25 Oct 2013, 23:35
by SinbadEV
Saw it in 3D... second row... the parts of the movie where I wasn't suffering the effects of motion sickness seemed pretty awesome.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 12:37
by Forboding Angel
Why the hell would you watch a 3d movie from the second row of a theatre?
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 13:53
by danil_kalina
The movie is not so awesome what you are talking about
I am not satisfied what I have seen. More than a half of the movie is a boring crap
Sandra is a bad actress
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 17:32
by gajop
danil_kalina wrote:More than a half of the movie is a boring crap

Yep, but the other half beats anything else this year.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 26 Oct 2013, 19:37
by SinbadEV
Forboding Angel wrote:Why the hell would you watch a 3d movie from the second row of a theatre?
Last minute decision, crowded cinema.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 00:17
by PicassoCT
Saw it again today.
And i seem to be a magnet for angsty teenage boys with there first girlfriend who spent the whole movie telling everyone how unaffected they are by this or that scene. "Victim" here, "Shit" there..
It makes you wish for a suppersoccer filled with a yellow fluid.
"Do you smell that too? Smells like teen spirirt, true?"
Praise be upon pirate bay for ripping the audience from the movie.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 02:30
by CarRepairer
CopyyyCattt wrote:Nice there is a cam copy..gonna watch it soon i guess.
Did the bootlegger use a stereoscopic video camera with the 3D glasses placed carefully over each of its lenses? I hope so for your sake.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 03:51
by smoth
I hate 3d movies, they are always blurry if I take my glasses off and the glasses don't fit over mine. If they are going to do it, I should not be required to have contacts. I am not wasting more money on that shit.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 27 Oct 2013, 10:10
by PicassoCT
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 08:07
by Forboding Angel
smoth wrote:I hate 3d movies, they are always blurry if I take my glasses off and the glasses don't fit over mine. If they are going to do it, I should not be required to have contacts. I am not wasting more money on that shit.
This movie was filmed specifically for 3d. There is a difference. I hate 3d movies and actually originally asked for a refund when I found out that they only had it in 3d, but the staff reassured me of what I said above.
Yep, it's entirely different. No eyestrain at all. This isn't some film with 3d tacked on as an afterthought to do a moneygrab.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 12:17
by Licho
It's a great movie and I enjoyed it in 3d .. but..
can anyone explain to me:
- why the Kowalski had to be separated and why he flew out and she flew back to ISS ?
- why did they go to grab a corpse instead of returning, when low on oxygen?
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 12:47
by dansan
Licho wrote:It's a great movie and I enjoyed it in 3d .. but..
can anyone explain to me:
- why the Kowalski had to be separated and why he flew out and she flew back to ISS ?
- why did they go to grab a corpse instead of returning, when low on oxygen?
I asked myself the same questions.
For the 1st one, I have come up with one possible explanation: If the ISS was rotating, then the centrifugal force would explain why he would be pulling her. If the strings that she had around her legs were stretched, then after releasing him, they would shrink and pull her back.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 13:00
by SinbadEV
dansan wrote:Licho wrote:It's a great movie and I enjoyed it in 3d .. but..
can anyone explain to me:
- why the Kowalski had to be separated and why he flew out and she flew back to ISS ?
- why did they go to grab a corpse instead of returning, when low on oxygen?
I asked myself the same questions.
For the 1st one, I have come up with one possible explanation: If the ISS was rotating, then the centrifugal force would explain why he would be pulling her. If the strings that she had around her legs were stretched, then after releasing him, they would shrink and pull her back.
Corpse thing was that they had not yet ascertained the severity of the situation. they didn't know they were going to have to do more than get back on their ship and fly home at that point (though they should have).
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 29 Oct 2013, 22:07
by PicassoCT
I think they were planing to eat mission specialist sharif.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 01 Nov 2013, 05:31
by Forboding Angel
SinbadEV wrote:
Corpse thing was that they had not yet ascertained the severity of the situation. they didn't know they were going to have to do more than get back on their ship and fly home at that point (though they should have).
This, they had no idea
*******SPOILER ALERT!!!*********
That the shuttle was so badly damaged, and only when they got back to it did they realize it was 100% boned.
Re: Gravity was so good it made my balls hurt.
Posted: 01 Nov 2013, 07:58
by danil_kalina

it is a movie, not a real life
