Nomic 3
Moderator: Moderators
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
Re: Nomic 3
I nominate SinbadEV's second proposal, and by the power of Rule 211 choose SinbadEV's first proposal to be included in the motion.
Re: Nomic 3
I vote in favor of the motion... wait... never mind... (sorry for editing this post... I'm dumb.)
Re: Nomic 3
I vote yea, and turn my thoughts to other modes of victory.
Re: Nomic 3
I vote we subscribe all of these early voters to a... boot to the head.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
Re: Nomic 3
My next motion will be to allow bestowing honorary titles upon players, and require players with an honorary title to sign all of their posts with their honorary title.
The one after that will be to award aegis with the honorary title of "Lord Doofus"...
The one after that will be to award aegis with the honorary title of "Lord Doofus"...
Re: Nomic 3
Reading the rules, it seems to me that votes must be pointed to a specific motion, but have no other requirements. Therefore, votes pointed directly at the motion to be initiated by Felix's nomination are perfectly valid.aegis wrote:I vote we subscribe all of these early voters to a... boot to the head.
Re: Nomic 3
eh?
SwiftSpear wrote:I don't count votes issued before voting has officially begun, please vote again.
Re: Nomic 3
Oh, didn't see that. Put it in the first post ffs.aegis wrote:eh?SwiftSpear wrote:I don't count votes issued before voting has officially begun, please vote again.
Edit: Frankly, it doesn't make much sense to me in terms of the rules. If it's admitted that they are votes, then what is wrong? Are there unwritten requirements for votes to be 'valid votes' and these are invalid? Does '4 votes' in context of the rules actually mean '4 votes issued during the voting period'? Do I need to issue a proposal for a rule that 'all votes until the voting period ends will be counted'?
Sorry if I come off as cross, but when I go into anal-retentive by-the-book thinking mode I don't like things that aren't clearly derived from the rules.
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Re: Nomic 3
A vote is in action. All proposals are now dead.
Motion 311: rule 202 should be ammended, change 100 to 500 and the game will be extended. AND: Modify rule rule 201 and this is how it can be done: The player whose vote decides which is the victors side, will have the 10 points due him summarily denied
Proposed by: SinbadEV
Any poster may vote either for or against the current motion. If the motion passes it will become a rule. A player voting for a passed motion will
receive 10 points, a player voting against a failed motion will receive 10 points. The first side to reach 4 votes wins.
Motion 311: rule 202 should be ammended, change 100 to 500 and the game will be extended. AND: Modify rule rule 201 and this is how it can be done: The player whose vote decides which is the victors side, will have the 10 points due him summarily denied
Proposed by: SinbadEV
Any poster may vote either for or against the current motion. If the motion passes it will become a rule. A player voting for a passed motion will
receive 10 points, a player voting against a failed motion will receive 10 points. The first side to reach 4 votes wins.
- SwiftSpear
- Classic Community Lead
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29
Re: Nomic 3
I vote nay.
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
Re: Nomic 3
In the interests of aegis not winning, I vote yes.
Re: Nomic 3
Welp. That's that.
Posting in a completed voting section.
Posting in a completed voting section.