but that implies all subpages are out of date etc. So I don't see that as correct. The KP downloads ARE valid.
Too many subpages are out date. If you feel a few good ones exist and that the note does them unjust: Then word the note more carefully.
KP: Those are 2 years old downloads, newer ones exist.
Which is probally why the KP moddb profile says:
Note: this moddb page having a very low activity, you might want to check:
- Kernel Panic page on SpringRTS.com wiki
- Kernel Panic subforum in SpringRTS.com forum
Either way, all I wanted was a bulleted list detailing what you wanted to have done so I could walk through it and demystify my answers with specific answers to your questions.
Moddb is only one of many sites.
It is not feasible when maintainers of sites want other people to tell them what to do in small detail.
If such level of counceling is required then the site maintainers are not doing their job, instead others would be doing it for them.
In fact, me locking people from posting news or video to the engine page of spring may be demotivating for some content devs. They like seeing their names in flashing lights etc.
It is the right thing to close it.
Foreboding was only one who posted a bit to it and even his last post was already a year old.
Last post by someone else was two years ago. This tells there was little interesst and people can still post to their own moddb-pages anyway.
I would not worry about moddb staff. They would not provide option to close site like that if they wanted nobody to make use of the option.