First SupCom Video: ChrisT's Second Coming, on Tape - Page 3

First SupCom Video: ChrisT's Second Coming, on Tape

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Optimus Prime
Posts: 755
Joined: 03 Oct 2005, 14:31

Post by Optimus Prime »

check this 11:20 mins video of Sup Com :) (hope no one posted it already)

http://www.downloads.gamereplays.org/su ... tation.zip
User avatar
Deathblane
Posts: 505
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 01:22

Post by Deathblane »

That's going to be amzingly, fantasticly sweet, I just really hope it doesn't come out around exam time.

Still there's nothing stopping waypoint editing and improved group ai (co-ordinated attacks anyone?) and probably most of the other shiny new features being added to spring. Seriously, a year from now could easily see a Spring WDesq mod looking like that.
User avatar
AF
AI Developer
Posts: 20687
Joined: 14 Sep 2004, 11:32

Post by AF »

Spring under zaphods new renderer should be able to zoom out even futher than Supcom on gigalithic map sizes such as 4kx4k
User avatar
Deathblane
Posts: 505
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 01:22

Post by Deathblane »

But it'd be nice to zoom in on the mouse pointer for the really quick navigation they were showing, and have you're units turn into radar dots once you were far enough away.

That reminds me, does spring support lodding? As that would reduce processor strain and would easily be modified to show you're units as icons or something at extreem range.
User avatar
PauloMorfeo
Posts: 2004
Joined: 15 Dec 2004, 20:53

Post by PauloMorfeo »

Warlord Zsinj wrote:Deathblane: One of the criticisms of AA is that it is so constantly changing,t hat nobody ever has the opportunity to get any good at the game. ...
That was most noticeable in the recent 1.44(?) version which lasted the longest. While AA had the reputation of beeing perfectly balanced, since it lasted long enough, people began to see that it had serious unbalances and begam claiming the need of a new version. That wasn't hapening, for sure, when it was changing every 2 weeks.
User avatar
PauloMorfeo
Posts: 2004
Joined: 15 Dec 2004, 20:53

Post by PauloMorfeo »

Optimus Prime wrote:check this 11:20 mins video of Sup Com :) (hope no one posted it already)

http://www.downloads.gamereplays.org/su ... tation.zip
:shock: :shock: :shock:

... :shock:

Picking up the patrol route with the mouse .. :shock: shinny explosion .. ... goddam cannons ... i wantss it :cry:
el_muchacho
Posts: 201
Joined: 30 Apr 2005, 01:06

Post by el_muchacho »

SwiftSpear wrote: If spring is going to realisticly compeate with sup comm in the first few months after it's release (which I don't think is really plausable) there's alot of changes that need to be made to the engine before that time so that it's more of a proper style game engine and less of a TA engine clone with new features.
But do we really want to compete with SupCom ? Personnally, I don't.
First I don't want to see GPG having to turn over here and say "stop it", while Chris Taylor thinks this project is good. This project is good and it does no harm to any company. It was necessary as TA is seen almost a sort of "public domain" goodie by lots of people. I don't think the same with SupCom, at least not before 5-6 years.
I wouldn't want to see GPG disappear like it happened to Cavedog. I wish the best of success to GPG so that they continue to design great games.
So Spring and SupCom are two different games with different gameplays and I think that's very well like that. Let's continue to debug and improve Spring while keeping its own spirit and not try to copy every feature of newer games.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

It'd be great if we could compeate with sup comm... I mean think of the user numbers we'd be maintaining if that was the case. But I really don't think it's plausible. This game engine is very closed, to compeate with sup comm we need an engine that is open enough to allow our talented moders to take thier visions to reality in full. Working around TA gameplay structures is doable for many mods, but it makes playing spring a little boring because even the most different mods are very similar to eachother.
User avatar
Lindir The Green
Posts: 815
Joined: 04 May 2005, 15:09

Post by Lindir The Green »

Warlord Zsinj wrote:Firstly, Spring IS TA. It wouldn't be here if it wasn't TA, and ignoring TA's roots would be immensely silly, because TA is a game that has yet to be surpassed as an RTS experience.
Spring is not just a remake of TA. And the thinking that it is really weakens the drive to add new, innovative features.
Absolute Annihilation, a mod disliked by much of the online OTA community, is the most popular mod.
Exactly. It is AA, not EE, Nanoblobs, gundam, FF, or SWS, that is the most popular. Because it is basically OTA updated for the Spring engine.

The old school TAers think that it strayed too far from OTA, but the "moderate" players, those who kinda liked OTA but didn't play much and thought that it was unbalanced, played AA, and now play AA on Spring.

IMO, of course. I havent taken a survey.

Supcom, when it comes out, will be much better than Spring. But Spring will (hopefully) keep growing at its slow steady pace, and will eventually surpass it.
User avatar
Zoombie
Posts: 6149
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 07:08

Post by Zoombie »

Now the thing about Sup com that makes me drool would be...

NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKES!

Finally, the full destructeve power of nukes will be unleashed on my enemys!
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Post by SwiftSpear »

Zoombie wrote:Now the thing about Sup com that makes me drool would be...

NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKES!

Finally, the full destructeve power of nukes will be unleashed on my enemys!
This can easily be done in spring. There just isn't a mod that it would be reasonably balanced for, it's too overpowering the way TA handles nukes.
User avatar
Zoombie
Posts: 6149
Joined: 15 Mar 2005, 07:08

Post by Zoombie »

Yeah, but then again. MUSHROOOM CLOUDS!

Also I'm always won over by nukes. If you want me to like a mod, give it nukes. No better yey, make a mod with NOTHING BUT NUKES!
User avatar
AF
AI Developer
Posts: 20687
Joined: 14 Sep 2004, 11:32

Post by AF »

Spring is already absorbing Sup com features

Look at my ETA groupAI.

Even zooming towards mouse cursor was implemented and submitted to svn yesterday by SJ.

Moving patrolpaths and other supcom stuff could be done with the new GUI if the lua based option is chosen.

I guess even a HW1/2 style sensor modecould be done with the lua based GUI option.
User avatar
Weaver
Posts: 644
Joined: 07 Jul 2005, 21:15

Post by Weaver »

Optimus Prime wrote:check this 11:20 mins video of Sup Com :) (hope no one posted it already)

http://www.downloads.gamereplays.org/su ... tation.zip
Listen very carefully at 2:30 and tell me what you hear?
User avatar
Deathblane
Posts: 505
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 01:22

Post by Deathblane »

Excellent!

To be honest, by the time it comes out the biggest difference (technically) between spring and Supercom will probably be the optimisation. This in turn will mean that Supercom's content will undoubtably be better (higher-poly, bump mapping, whatever) than springs but I guess that'll be the main difference.

Even saying all that the only real differnce between the quality of that map and the quality of some of springs better ones was the dodads (tree's etc) and the oceon floor. That of course and the huge size.
User avatar
Min3mat
Posts: 3455
Joined: 17 Nov 2004, 20:19

Post by Min3mat »

errr...the biggest difference is going to be the GAMEPLAY O_o
seriously! :\
spring could be just like supcom, ppl could make missions silly units optimise code etc etc. but they're either too lazy (hey its not like they get paid ^^) or have to do other things (or a combination of the two)
maverick256
Posts: 115
Joined: 21 Sep 2004, 19:41

Post by maverick256 »

Weaver wrote:
Optimus Prime wrote:check this 11:20 mins video of Sup Com :) (hope no one posted it already)

http://www.downloads.gamereplays.org/su ... tation.zip
Listen very carefully at 2:30 and tell me what you hear?
Do I hear "spring look"?
User avatar
Deathblane
Posts: 505
Joined: 01 Feb 2006, 01:22

Post by Deathblane »

The precise phrase was 'it's got a spring look' .
User avatar
FizWizz
Posts: 1998
Joined: 17 Aug 2005, 11:42

Post by FizWizz »

maverick256 wrote:
Weaver wrote:
Optimus Prime wrote:check this 11:20 mins video of Sup Com :) (hope no one posted it already)

http://www.downloads.gamereplays.org/su ... tation.zip
Listen very carefully at 2:30 and tell me what you hear?
Do I hear "spring look"?
Deathblane wrote:The precise phrase was 'it's got a spring look' .
:-)
I actually like the current Spring look. Could use a couple adjustments to color and opactiy, but it's good and clutter-free.
Archangel of Death
Posts: 854
Joined: 28 Jan 2005, 18:15

Post by Archangel of Death »

He was talking about the camera when he said "spring look".
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”