Springie the AutoHost - Page 20

Springie the AutoHost

Various things about Spring that do not fit in any of the other forums listed below, including forum rules.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
BytesBR
Posts: 12
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 19:04

Commands

Post by BytesBR »

How i can edit the commands of Springie? I want add more commands!
User avatar
Licho
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3803
Joined: 19 May 2006, 19:13

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Licho »

Source code only or create preset with commands.
You can create preset and add list commands to it
User avatar
BytesBR
Posts: 12
Joined: 20 Sep 2008, 19:04

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by BytesBR »

I go test now, thanks!
ksf
Posts: 10
Joined: 05 Sep 2008, 16:22

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by ksf »

I'd like to see three things:

1) Information about the current vote going on, that is, have !vote without options display "no poll", "poll: kick ABC?", "poll: map: Tabula V2" etc and also mention it while giving vote status

2) Always display the issuer of a command to avoid e.g. pm ringspamming

3) display "colors don't need fixing" if !fixcolors doesn't do a thing.
User avatar
momfreeek
Posts: 625
Joined: 29 Apr 2008, 16:50

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by momfreeek »

Licho wrote:It's more complex than that. There are also legitimate clans with tag on the end.
Is this significant? I've not seen anyone with clan tags at end of name, just 'mod support' or suchlike.
Licho wrote:It assumes you can be member of multiple clans and groups "rarest" clans together when possible.

If there are 2 LCC and 5 CA players LCC clan grouping has priority over CA.
This is one case where the system works as intended, but it does make assumptions. Of 4 [PWN] clan members I can see at the moment, 2 players have a [NOTA] end-tag. Would this then seperate them out in a cbalance?

As you have to make certain assumptions, surely it makes more sense to support common practice rather than rare clan end-tags.
User avatar
Licho
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3803
Joined: 19 May 2006, 19:13

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Licho »

At time when I was coding it, end tags were pretty common and many people were members of several clans (like [K]) and there were no mod based tags (except [EE]
900ftjesus
Posts: 9
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 04:31

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by 900ftjesus »

I'm getting errors with !dlmod and !dlmap. I'm pretty sure I'm using the newest version of Springie. Is this a known issue or is there a workaround?
User avatar
Licho
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3803
Joined: 19 May 2006, 19:13

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Licho »

give it direct url
Mephistos
Posts: 50
Joined: 20 Jun 2008, 06:48

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Mephistos »

Licho,

Are there any known problems getting Springie 1.19 to work with the new version of spring? I just installed (upgraded), and now I consistently get an error: Unhandled exception - this only seems to happen when I configure it to run as minimized, as in Full Screen = False.

Have you seen this happen with your Springie setups? Or do I need to use the dedicated server now to run springie?
User avatar
Licho
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3803
Joined: 19 May 2006, 19:13

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Licho »

No known errors. But there is new springie with dedicated serve, just dedicated erver is broken atm.
Mephistos
Posts: 50
Joined: 20 Jun 2008, 06:48

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Mephistos »

Licho wrote:No known errors. But there is new springie with dedicated serve, just dedicated erver is broken atm.

That's too bad. Because the regular install seems to be dead at the moment on my server box. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.
User avatar
Licho
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3803
Joined: 19 May 2006, 19:13

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Licho »

Springie is atm waiting for fix of dedicated server:
http://spring.clan-sy.com/mantis/view.php?id=1081

There is no point hosting by running spring.exe since dedicated server is now availiable. It just needs fixing.
imbaczek
Posts: 3629
Joined: 22 Aug 2006, 16:19

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by imbaczek »

Licho: this is fixed as of 77b3 I believe, just not marked as resolved; should be somewhere in svn log.
Posts
Posts: 63
Joined: 02 Oct 2007, 04:00

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Posts »

[4:15:15 PM] <Posts> how goes dedicated server + springie? "Licho: this is fixed as of 77b3 I believe, just not marked as resolved; should be somewhere in svn log."
[4:15:30 PM] <[LCC]Licho[CA]> there is another bug posts
[4:15:32 PM] <[LCC]Licho[CA]> with /take
[4:15:34 PM] <[LCC]Licho[CA]> cuasing it to crash
Mephistos
Posts: 50
Joined: 20 Jun 2008, 06:48

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Mephistos »

Looks like both of these are resolved - what do I need to do to get springie to use dedicated server now? :)

Counting on you man.

User avatar
Licho
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3803
Joined: 19 May 2006, 19:13

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Licho »

What makes you think these are resolved.. none of them is resolved..
Mephistos
Posts: 50
Joined: 20 Jun 2008, 06:48

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Mephistos »

Licho wrote:What makes you think these are resolved.. none of them is resolved..
My bad. Jumping the gun here.
Mephistos
Posts: 50
Joined: 20 Jun 2008, 06:48

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Mephistos »

Can you tell I really wanna get this working?
User avatar
Licho
Zero-K Developer
Posts: 3803
Joined: 19 May 2006, 19:13

Re: Springie the AutoHost

Post by Licho »

We all want it to work :)
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”