Nomic 3 - Page 14

Nomic 3

Post just about everything that isn't directly related to Spring here!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SwiftSpear »

Image

Vote 313 has been accepted.

Player rankings:
lurker - 50 (proposed: rule 209) {6}
KDR-11k - -5 {1}
Peet - 30 {3}
Decimator - 10 {2}
SinbadEV - 70 (proposed: rule 211){7}
neddiedrow - 75 {7}
aegis - 100 (proposed: rule 205, rule 207, rule 210) {10}
Felix the Cat - 40(proposed: rule 206) {5}
Erom - 20 {2}
nemppu - 10 {1}(proposed: rule 213)
manored - 20{2}
Ixoran - 30 {3}
SwiftSpear the rhymey - -100

Current list of mutable rules:
  • 201 - Every vote in which a player is on the victor's side (the vote the player issued was the same as the winning vote) that player shall receive 10 points and the player whose vote decides which is the victors side, will have the 10 points due him summarily denied
  • 202 - While no player has 500 points or greater the game will continue
  • 203 - The player who has been on the victor's side the highest number of times at the end of the game is the winner
  • 204 - The game will end when there is no rule requiring it's continuation
  • 205 - To win the game, a player must have originally submitted one of the current game's rules in a proposal during the current game
  • 206 - All posts by a Judge must be in hot pink, color code #FF0080
  • 207 - Proposals must contain rhyme
  • 208 - To make the game a little more fun, every voting period a poster can have a valid vote numbering only at 1
  • 209 - Swiftspear the rhymey, despite not being a player, has as of this post a score of -100 for interpreting rule 108 in a loose way so to exclude votes.
  • 210 - if a player nominates a proposal then votes against it and it fails to pass, they gain 5 additional points and the original submitter of the proposal loses 5 points. (prop: aegis)
  • 211 - When a proposal is nominated for vote, A second existing proposal of the nominating parties choosing may be included as part of the motion (such that the motion, should it be accepted, will bring two new rules or two separate addendum to a current rule or any combination thereof into play) (prop: SinbadEV)
  • 212 - If a vote is initiated, all proposals are dead, all nominations are dead, old nominations must be created new at the end of the vote, new nominations may not be issued until the vote is complete
  • 213 - to all judge's posts an image added, of a chicken, fried.(prop: nemppu)
  • 214 - The player currently leading in victorious votes shall be given the title of "numpty", and to liven the game, this title must be always used in reference to the player and at the end of his post, so he is abused. ALSO: In the interest of charity, whenever a player casts one of the (up to 7) valid votes for or against a motion, they must specify another active player to nominate for promotion. Each of these nominations must contain a title and can be enacted by a different player seconding the nomination during the period between a proposals acceptance and the opening of the next round of voting. To avoid confusion the titles will be granted in an additional post by the judge following the start of a vote for a motion. Valid Titles must be chosen from This Article. An active player is a player who has posted in the thread at least once.


We are back on proposal time.

manored
Posts: 3179
Joined: 15 Nov 2006, 00:37

Re: Nomic 3

Post by manored »

Nutty trails and chicken races
can take you to different places
A flame can help a shakey hand
and a pious folk may understand

I propose that only manored, he who nominates this motion and those who vote in favor of it may vote for motions, propose for motions or nominate motions.
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Peet »

I nominate this proposal.
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SwiftSpear »

Image
A vote is in action. All proposals are now dead.

Motion 314: I propose that only manored, he who nominates this motion and those who vote in favor of it may vote for motions, propose for motions or nominate motions.

Proposed by: manored

Any poster may vote either for or against the current motion. If the motion passes it will become a rule. A player voting for a passed motion will

receive 10 points, a player voting against a failed motion will receive 10 points. The first side to reach 4 votes wins.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Felix the Cat »

I vote nay.
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Peet »

I vote yes.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Felix the Cat »

Both of our votes are invalid as they do not nominate a player for title. Per Rule 214, all votes MUST nominate another active player for promotion.

Therefore, I vote no, and nominate Peet for the title of Prima Ballerina.
User avatar
aegis
Posts: 2456
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 17:47

Re: Nomic 3

Post by aegis »

I favor this motion by choosing its best interests and voting no, and hereby nominate Felix to the title of Goodwife.
I also nominate this motion.

--numpty
Last edited by aegis on 21 Apr 2008, 07:08, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Peet
Malcontent
Posts: 4384
Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Peet »

I vote yes and nominate Felix for the title of Tarkhaan.
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SinbadEV »

I vote yes and nominate peet for the title of Nanny
User avatar
lurker
Posts: 3842
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: Nomic 3

Post by lurker »

I vote in poor favor of this motion and nominate/Advocate Peet for promotion.

So if someone seconds this what does Peet get promoted to?

And if anyone wants to declare this post invalid they had best read the rules closely first.
Last edited by lurker on 21 Apr 2008, 06:08, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SinbadEV
Posts: 6475
Joined: 02 May 2005, 03:56

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SinbadEV »

lurker wrote:I vote in poor favor of this motion and nominate/Advocate Peet for promotion.

So if someone seconds this what does Peet get promoted to? Judge?

And if anyone wants to declare this post invalid they had best read the rules closely first.
Based on my understanding of the rules, you Just nominated Peet to the position of judge

In the interest of charity, whenever a player casts one of the (up to 7) valid votes for or against a motion, they must specify another active player to nominate for promotion. Each of these nominations must contain a title and can be enacted by a different player seconding the nomination during the period between a proposals acceptance and the opening of the next round of voting. To avoid confusion the titles will be granted in an additional post by the judge following the start of a vote for a motion. Valid Titles must be chosen from This Article. An active player is a player who has posted in the thread at least once.

You Nominated Peet
Your Post contained the title of Judge

Unfortunately, the rules clearly state the the position of Judge is declared by a motion, so this tile would be entirely ceremonial or the current Judge can veto it.

edit: oops, misread the rules... based on my understanding you have nominated Peet to the position of judge.
User avatar
aegis
Posts: 2456
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 17:47

Re: Nomic 3

Post by aegis »

OMG COLOR hao i maek color?
User avatar
lurker
Posts: 3842
Joined: 08 Jan 2007, 06:13

Re: Nomic 3

Post by lurker »

Oh fuck. I turned my brain off for a second. Sorry. I'm editing my post now to remove the word judge.
User avatar
Felix the Cat
Posts: 2383
Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30

Re: Nomic 3

Post by Felix the Cat »

In the meantime, the next proposal had better give me something to do.

Consider yourselves held ransom, at penalty of lolcat spaem. :twisted:

Also, aegis' post MUST end in "numpty" per rule 214.

(tbh this past proposal sucked. why exclude all but 5 people from the game? bleh.)
User avatar
nemppu
Posts: 417
Joined: 25 Jun 2007, 22:27

Re: Nomic 3

Post by nemppu »

I vote yes and nominate Felix the Cat to receive the title of Earl
User avatar
SwiftSpear
Classic Community Lead
Posts: 7287
Joined: 12 Aug 2005, 09:29

Re: Nomic 3

Post by SwiftSpear »

Image
mmm, crap, I can't really pass this rule since it's invalid and directly conflicts with other rules (Any post that contains a valid proposal is a proposal and any player may nominate any post) The part about votes being blocked is valid, but I can't dissallow players from proposing or nominating.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Nomic 3

Post by KDR_11k »

So proposals are allowed again?

Although this isn't Fark,
I propose we ban Argh.
User avatar
KDR_11k
Game Developer
Posts: 8293
Joined: 25 Jun 2006, 08:44

Re: Nomic 3

Post by KDR_11k »

I really cannot rhyme,
I'll go eat a lime.
A proposal must never change its effect between creation and being put into effect, e.g. the people affected by it must be determined by actions taking place before the proposition or after it takes effect.
User avatar
rattle
Damned Developer
Posts: 8278
Joined: 01 Jun 2006, 13:15

Re: Nomic 3

Post by rattle »

Yo nigra respect mine
or anger the tech nine.

I hereby nominate KDR's motion out of pity.
KDR_11k wrote:I really cannot rhyme,
I'll go eat a lime.
A proposal must never change its effect between creation and being put into effect, e.g. the people affected by it must be determined by actions taking place before the proposition or after it takes effect.
Post Reply

Return to “Off Topic Discussion”