My own personal opinion aside but I was under the impression from the rapturous praise in the BA site thread that people liked the new BA website? Especially when the media abilities of the site were touted in numerous posts as an improvement?
My own personal opinion aside but I was under the impression from the rapturous praise in the BA site thread that people liked the new BA website? Especially when the media abilities of the site were touted in numerous posts as an improvement?
One response:
Quote:
Yes, the landing page is a bit minimalistic at the moment. Should contain info about what this project is
eg you have "Games" and "Download" links, like the current design. People click "Download" -> they get to the engine-only download -> "zomg i cant play this" So that download page would need a notice "If you just want to get ready to play, you want this: Games Downloads" So nothing is changed...
The spring website is complicated because its products are complicated. You need all those various guides, how-to's and multiple downloads because there is no one-click-fun product. (that is really simple)
A second banner with a different logo, and a tagline
Learn More
Download and play
See the games
A video with a menu of tabs
Engine news
Comunity News
Even the menu has a massive amount of redundancy, shouldn't report bugs and help be merged into some kind of 'support' page? Development can br reached from wiki and wiki can be reached from development, and games can be reached from about etc...
What my idea has:
A small block with text/links whatever is chosen to go in by whoever has access
A pretty backdrop with an empty region for the above mentioned block
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43 Location: Raegquitting Spring on 04/24/12
AF, I would argue that a small "About" paragraph should be added somewhere, so that casual people passing by will have a quick answer to the question "Wtf am I?"
Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?
Spring happens to be about games, and we look quite similar to most popular game official sites (lol, starcraft, wow, etc.). Probably the only ones that are different have way too much flash. KISS is fine, just keep the news on top (even if only summaries).
Joined: 07 Feb 2005, 21:30 Location: Cheese factory
gajop wrote:
Cheesecan wrote:
Go minimalism. I agree with AF.
Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?
Spring happens to be about games, and we look quite similar to most popular game official sites (lol, starcraft, wow, etc.). Probably the only ones that are different have way too much flash. KISS is fine, just keep the news on top (even if only summaries).
Sure, if you want to look the same as the rest.. but why not try to stand out?
Starcraft and World of warcraft aren't built to attract passers by, most people already know who starcraft or warcraft is when they go there, those sites serve a different purpose. What's more they aren't game engines, they're games.
I propose that individual games should not be given super big features beyond artwork on the main site, instead specific parts of them should be cherry picked as demonstrations of what the engine is capable of.
At most give games individual subsections so they can make a pretty page with a summary and maybe a video and gallery, and a link offsite, but no more. Themed BBpress for that particular project if needs be but I don't see that being a big thing.
There's a belief here that we need to use the kudos and brand power of the engine to lift up our games and make them successful. That's like asking the homeless to pay for mortgages because the middle classes have been hit by the recession. If anything it should be the other way around.
Spring website is 2000s web design, this is how new websites look.
Edit: Where are our twitter buttons? RSS feeds?
Spring happens to be about games, and we look quite similar to most popular game official sites (lol, starcraft, wow, etc.). Probably the only ones that are different have way too much flash. KISS is fine, just keep the news on top (even if only summaries).
Sure, if you want to look the same as the rest.. but why not try to stand out?
Not sure we can get away with
"First class documentation
Our documentation is one of our most prized possessions and it is frequently updated."
But thanks - another example with actual content beyond pretty pictures.
Joined: 17 Nov 2005, 02:43 Location: Raegquitting Spring on 04/24/12
AF, if the wiki could be converted over to wordpress, we could use it to do entire dynamically generated sitemaps, rss feeds of those pages... a WHOLE lot of very neat stuff.
Ooooh boy, I get a little moist thinking about all that we could do with a wordpress spring site. The rss feeds alone would be worth their weight in gold.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum