View topic - 2 suggestions for improvement



All times are UTC + 1 hour


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 13:47 

Joined: 28 May 2009, 15:24
I experienced 2 problems in my last game, which I just wanted to share with you:

1. The jammer tower makes all my units barely visible, this is annoying cause you cannot find units you're searching that good.

2. This satellite thing in core's hover-factory has blocked my build position in the middle of my base. Can this be fixed?

Regards, jeykey :)


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 14:43 
User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 00:43
Agree about cloaked units. Never used hovers enough to know about the other thing. There's a real problem distinguishing cloaked units - a whole bunch of stuff hiding under a cloaker is really hard to disinguish. I'd love to have an alternate cloaking effect - maybe something similar to the stun/fire effect, but black. That might be easier.

Either way, in a similar vein, I think the Arm stun-self-destruct crawler needs a bigger model, or a different sunken/cloaked effect, as it's really hard to distinguish from a Flea. In general, it just looks too small for a unit as expensive as it is.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 15:16 

Joined: 28 May 2009, 15:24
Pxtl wrote:
Either way, in a similar vein, I think the Arm stun-self-destruct crawler needs a bigger model, or a different sunken/cloaked effect, as it's really hard to distinguish from a Flea. In general, it just looks too small for a unit as expensive as it is.


Yes, a bigger model would be cool, as they got lost so easily...


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 15:38 
User avatar

Joined: 07 Apr 2009, 11:43
bigger model = easier to hit


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 19:13 
Zero-K Developer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2008, 02:11
Location: In search for TheTruth (TM)
I remember discussing the addition of a little platter of 'glow' below crawlers to make them easier to see, but we forgot about it, and it never got implemented. What do you guys think about this?


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 19:24 
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 06:11
Location: Vacation
Why not implement the glow with the actual unit itself? I think it turned out pretty well with the roach; its a lot easier to see now when it isn't cloaked.

I could do a tick model pretty quickly as well. I have a couple ideas already. But yeah: bigger = easier to hit (unless you hack the hitsphere which is not an ideal solution), which isn't very desirable for ticks.

Also: "satellite thing" is kind of vague. I haven't played hover much yet either, do you mind explaining a little bit more what that is and/or how to recreate it?


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 19:37 
Zero-K Developer
User avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2008, 02:11
Location: In search for TheTruth (TM)
maackey wrote:
Why not implement the glow with the actual unit itself? I think it turned out pretty well with the roach; its a lot easier to see now when it isn't cloaked.

Cloaked roaches are nearly invisible even to their owners. :-)

...Maybe we could just increase the opacity on the cloaker effect and redo the tick model.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 19:39 

Joined: 28 May 2009, 15:24
maackey wrote:

Also: "satellite thing" is kind of vague. I haven't played hover much yet either, do you mind explaining a little bit more what that is and/or how to recreate it?


I mean the unit "Owl: altitude spy-drone", it flies high above other units and works as a radar. It can only be destroid by a special missle (don't know which, tactical nuke?).


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 19:44 
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 02 Jul 2008, 06:11
Location: Vacation
oh, I suppose I forgot to mention that I completely agree with the cloaker effect. Mass shields have a similar problem except they completely block out everything inside them when they get too dense.

EDIT: the Owl is in the *gunship* lab, not the hover (which I personally don't think it should be in anyway). It has a very short los, so it doesn't really work like a radar. It is destroyed by the long range missile towers. As for the build position blocking, I'm not entirely sure whats causing that. Perhaps the widget that shows a little marker on the ground?


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 02 Jan 2010, 20:30 

Joined: 28 May 2009, 15:24
maackey wrote:
the Owl is in the *gunship* lab, not the hover

Yes right, I mixed up the names...

maackey wrote:
As for the build position blocking, I'm not entirely sure whats causing that.
Perhaps the widget that shows a little marker on the ground?


Yeah, somebody with whom I spoke about the problem said sth. like that


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2010, 09:17 
Zero-K Developer

Joined: 28 Nov 2006, 13:22
The owl is a dumb unit that should be removed. Too many special target cats. Unless we can figure out how to get altitude aiming to behave so things dont fire at it because its -geniunely- too high.

Agree on cloak, the old cloak effect was fine imo, though perhaps we can have both at once.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2010, 16:06 
Server Owner & Developer
User avatar

Joined: 19 May 2006, 18:13
Location: Brno, Czech rep., EU, Terra, Sol, Orion arm, Milky way, Virgo supercluster
I love owl.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2010, 16:42 
User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2004, 00:43
iirc, in 1fac the Owl is becoming a multifunction-nuke-launcher warhead isn't it? Then it makes more sense - it's stopped by the anti-nuke, and the Screamer becomes just-another-anti-air-weapon.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 03 Jan 2010, 18:40 
A.N.T.S. Developer
User avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2009, 20:26
Location: Ukraine
JohannesH wrote:
bigger model = easier to hit


100% false.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 05 Jan 2010, 10:03 
Zero-K Developer

Joined: 28 Nov 2006, 13:22
Pxtl wrote:
iirc, in 1fac the Owl is becoming a multifunction-nuke-launcher warhead isn't it? Then it makes more sense - it's stopped by the anti-nuke, and the Screamer becomes just-another-anti-air-weapon.

Not necessarily.

It might end up in that factory, though the implementation is questionable. The method of stopping it, however, remains to be seen.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2010, 09:50 
User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 14:36
Location: Infront of my computer
d_b wrote:
JohannesH wrote:
bigger model = easier to hit


100% false.

Yup, someone doesnt know how spring works.

Bigger hit sphere means easier to hit.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2010, 13:19 
Supreme Annihilation Maintainer
User avatar

Joined: 11 Jan 2008, 16:55
Why have a cloaking effect per unit? if units are under a cloaking shield isn't it enough to just display some effect of the cloaking sphere?


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2010, 15:34 
Moderator

Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 08:24
Quote:
1. The jammer tower makes all my units barely visible, this is annoying cause you cannot find units you're searching that good.
My graphics bugged so I now see the default spring cloaking graphics. To fix your issue you could try many gfx cards until your graphics bugs.

Spawn_Retard wrote:
d_b wrote:
JohannesH wrote:
bigger model = easier to hit


100% false.

Yup, someone doesnt know how spring works.

Bigger hit sphere means easier to hit.
The sphere is independantly controllable. Small hitspheres should have small models for intuativeness.

Gota wrote:
Why have a cloaking effect per unit? if units are under a cloaking shield isn't it enough to just display some effect of the cloaking sphere?
Individual units under the cloaker can decloak while others are cloaked.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 19 Jan 2010, 16:01 
User avatar

Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 14:36
Location: Infront of my computer
you could have a model the size of the screen, but the hit sphere only 1/100000th, it would be incredibly hard to hit.

I think spring should support (if it already doesnt) multiple hitspheres for weak points?

wait... thinking about it spring already does.


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
PostPosted: 20 Jan 2010, 08:12 
Zero-K Developer

Joined: 28 Nov 2006, 13:22
Spawn_Retard wrote:
you could have a model the size of the screen, but the hit sphere only 1/100000th, it would be incredibly hard to hit.

I think spring should support (if it already doesnt) multiple hitspheres for weak points?

wait... thinking about it spring already does.

Yes, but we arent doing that!


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Site layout created by Roflcopter et al.