View topic - SM3

View unanswered posts | View active topics



Board index » Development » Development

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 11
  [ 212 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Beherith
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 12:00 
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2007, 15:21
AF wrote:
Until then can we not make it so we could allow multiple versions of a map that are functionally equivilant but have different numbers of layers?

e..g we could mark a set of layers as non-important, and thus they-ll get rendered on faster machines, without leaving lower end machines out in the cold, or machines under heavy stress.

I'm thinking of a new terrain texture quality slider, filtering out layers the mappers flagged as unimportant , and downsampling textures

I highly disagree.
The load isnt all that big, and my 3 year old gfx card has no trouble running it on high quality.

Would everyone please do me a favor and test the map I uploaded? It uses 5 2k*2k textures in 4 blend operations (also 2k*2k blendmaps).
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Tobi
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 13:36 
Spring Developer

Joined: 01 Jun 2005, 10:36
Location: The Netherlands
I used it yesterday while testing, got 20-30 FPS on my 9300M IIRC.
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Satirik
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 15:04 
Lobby Developer

Joined: 16 Mar 2007, 18:27
using tilesize=16 for grass stuff it looks even nicer, can't do the same for rock or you see the tiles when zooming out, would need more rock mixing like you did for grass to hide them, and yes the bumpmapping is not working

anyway good job !
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
hoijui
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 15:57 
Spring Developer
User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2007, 08:51
i like this (AFs) suggestion, though i have no idea about all this stuff, if it was possible, how difficult and what not.. but sounds nice :D
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Auswaschbar
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 16:51 
Spring Developer

Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 07:34
Location: 50┬░ 56' N, 11┬░ 35' O
Code:
[      0] Segmentation fault (SIGSEGV) in spring 0.80+.0.0 (Debug)
Stacktrace:
./spring() [0xceca77]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x32230) [0x7f0a83782230]
/usr/lib/libIL.so.1(iConvertPalette+0x425) [0x7f0a85e24315]
/usr/lib/libIL.so.1(iConvertImage+0x1fb) [0x7f0a85e248cb]
/usr/lib/libIL.so.1(ilConvertImage+0x10f) [0x7f0a85e24b1f]
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/Rendering/Textures/Bitmap.cpp:291
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/Map/SM3/Sm3Map.cpp:336
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/Map/ReadMap.cpp:62
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/Game/Game.cpp:416
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/Game/PreGame.cpp:238
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/Game/PreGame.cpp:152
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/System/SpringApp.cpp:849
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/System/SpringApp.cpp:977
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/System/Main.cpp:111
/home/karl/spring/source/rts/System/Main.cpp:128

Got this when loading beheriths testmap with latest master.
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Frostregen
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 18:48 

Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 23:52
Beherith wrote:
Would everyone please do me a favor and test the map I uploaded? It uses 5 2k*2k textures in 4 blend operations (also 2k*2k blendmaps).


Runs fine ~400fps.

Btw, your blendmap res is way to high.
Isn't the whole point of SM3 to save texture memory to allow larger maps?
I reduced them to 256x256, which gives the same result ingame. (I think)

Question: Are SM3 maps still required to be square?
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Beherith
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 20:04 
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2007, 15:21
Did some tests with less layers and lower levels of details, set to 1024 textures, improvements were very low.

Still around 100 fps, high terrain detail and shadows added as well.

Also, I tried DDS, but it shows up as black :(
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Frostregen
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 20:18 

Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 23:52
frostregen.darkstars.co.uk/sm3_testmap.sd7

It's your map with 256x256 blendmaps,
textures still 2048 but converted to jpg,
and tilesize 32 for grass.

This moves filesize to 8,5mb with little quality difference.


Last edited by Frostregen on 12 Dec 2009, 02:26, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Satirik
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 20:31 
Lobby Developer

Joined: 16 Mar 2007, 18:27
Frostregen wrote:
frostregen.darkstars.co.uk/sm3_testmap.sd7

Its your map with 256x256 blendmaps,
textures still 2048 but converted to jpg,
and tilesize 32 for grass.

This moves filesize to 8,5mb with little quality difference.


almost the same except for the flow which shouldn't be resized that much
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Frostregen
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 20:33 

Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 23:52
Flow had not been resized?

Code:
      [trocks]
      {
         File=Maps/res/rocks+det.jpg;
         TileSize=50;
      }
   
      [bgrass1]
      {
         File=Maps/res/bgrass1+det.jpg;
         TileSize=32;
      }      
   
      [ggrass1]
      {
         File=Maps/res/ggrass1+det.jpg;
         TileSize=32;
      }

      [bgrass2]
      {
         File=Maps/res/bgrass2+det.jpg;
         TileSize=32;
      }
      
      [flow]
      {
         File=Maps/res/flow+det.jpg;
         TileSize=50;
      }
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Argh
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 11 Dec 2009, 23:32 
P.U.R.E. Developer
User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38
Location: Herding cats uphill whilst wearing roller skates.
Quote:
Also, I tried DDS, but it shows up as black
Try that test map I posted, I would like confirmation that it's DDS.

And I tested yours- it's a lot smaller than mine, but performance was worse- 25-30 FPS vs 30-40.

I'll take a look at the "size of blendmap" optimization, that sounds like a useful idea.
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Satirik
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 00:18 
Lobby Developer

Joined: 16 Mar 2007, 18:27
Frostregen wrote:
Flow had not been resized?

resized the texture, on behe's map you see small strips around the hills
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Argh
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 00:33 
P.U.R.E. Developer
User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38
Location: Herding cats uphill whilst wearing roller skates.
Heightmaps must be powers of two. So either you have 512 (8X8) or you must use 16X16.

Not real happy about that, it's going to mean a lot of workarounds, to get the sizes I actually want.
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Satirik
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 00:48 
Lobby Developer

Joined: 16 Mar 2007, 18:27
Argh wrote:
Heightmaps must be powers of two. So either you have 512 (8X8) or you must use 16X16.

Not real happy about that, it's going to mean a lot of workarounds, to get the sizes I actually want.


why does it have to be a power of two ?
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Argh
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 01:08 
P.U.R.E. Developer
User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38
Location: Herding cats uphill whilst wearing roller skates.
It just does, apparently. Crashed and told me to use nearest power-of-two.

More irritating is that I can't use a double-resolution heightmap, or have it just read RAW correctly, so the resulting heightmaps aren't that great.
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Frostregen
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 01:22 

Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 23:52
Did you try png 16 bit gray? (no idea if it works)
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Argh
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 01:26 
P.U.R.E. Developer
User avatar

Joined: 21 Feb 2005, 03:38
Location: Herding cats uphill whilst wearing roller skates.
No, but PNG with alpha made Spring crash, not holding my breath on that.
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Frostregen
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 01:32 

Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 23:52
You're fast...
just tested it. works flawlessly :)
Even using 16bit of detail, as far as i can tell.

Btw, why alpha for a heightmap?
PNG supports 16bit grayscale natively.

Still... square + power of two is extremely limiting.
Can't even think of a reason (opengl wise) why this limitation exists.
Code:
512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384 which corresponds to
8     16     32    64   128   256 in spring mapsizes.


Hmmm, would be interesting how well spring handles those extreme sizes.


Last edited by Frostregen on 12 Dec 2009, 01:44, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Peet
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 01:40 
Malcontent
User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2006, 22:04
Location: Hurrrrrr.
64x64 (Block Wars) works alright. Go for 256! :D
Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Frostregen
 Post subject: Re: SM3
PostPosted: 12 Dec 2009, 01:55 

Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 23:52
Damn, 256x256 won't load ;)

Code:
[      0] Loading map informations
[      0] Loading sm3_testmap.sm3
[      0] loading heightmap (Maps/res/h2.png)...
[      0] Failed to convert heightmap image (Maps/res/h2.png) to grayscale image.


Hrm, 128x128 won't load too... std::bad_alloc

Code:
[      0] Loading map informations
[      0] Loading sm3_testmap.sm3
[      0] loading heightmap (Maps/res/h2.png)...
[      0] heightmap size: 8193x8193
[      0] initializing heightmap renderer...
[      0]   generating terrain normals for shading...
[      0] initializing texturing system...
[      0]   parsing texture stages...
[      0]   loading textures and blendmaps...
[      0]     loading texture bgrass1 from Maps/res/bgrass1+det.jpg...
[      0]     loading blendmap gGrass1Blender from Maps/res/Maskggrass1.png...
[      0]     loading texture ggrass1 from Maps/res/ggrass1+det.jpg...
[      0]     loading blendmap bGrass2Blender from Maps/res/Maskbgrass2.png...
[      0]     loading texture bgrass2 from Maps/res/bgrass2+det.jpg...
[      0]     loading blendmap RockBlender from Maps/res/Maskrocks.png...
[      0]     loading texture flow from Maps/res/flow+det.jpg...
[      0]     loading blendmap flowBlender from Maps/res/flow.png...
[      0]     loading texture trocks from Maps/res/rocks+det.jpg...
[      0]   generating blendmap mipmaps...
[      0]   loading blendmaps into OpenGL...
[      0]   initializing terrain node shaders...
[      0]   deleting temporary blendmap data...
[      0] Index buffer data size: 55488
[      0] Loading Map


Hell, even 64x64 crashes :(
Code:
[      0] Loading unit definitions
[      0] Loading feature definitions
[      0] Generating trees
[      0] Creating unit textures
[      0] Initializing map features


Did you test on 64bit OS or something?


Last edited by Frostregen on 12 Dec 2009, 02:54, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 11
  [ 212 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

Board index » Development » Development

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Site layout created by Roflcopter et al.