The f2 view is difficult to discern pathing.

request:
change from a gradient to have color bands:

- passable
- passable with slowdown
- UNPASSABLE.

I don't care about the colors just need some way to see what is actually passable.

it would be a great help to mappers, content devs working on movement classes and players trying to discern

These 3 things are very clear to me from your image. Although a completely different colour for UNPASSABLE wouldn't be a bad thing.

I don't know if it's the case for smoth, but red-green color blindness is common enough. So making the impassable areas blue for example, would make it clear for everyone better than just a different red shade.

That isn't the only issue

Protanopia:


Deuteranopia:


Achromatopsia:

I suggest we move towards a deep dark red almost black for unpassable, with a hard cut off, then for the rest, a gradient of light green with a tint of blue for passable, and a darker purple for semi passable:

please don't turn this into an artistic endeavor.

P.S. I don't care about colorblind people.

Not to me, I can see that it is orange but UNPASSABLE is fairly hard to tell because of the nature of gradients.

Green and blue are not good colour choices either. They are the same in Japanese.

ao and midori are not the same even when it was the same midori was a shade of ao.. try again :)

To me the big problem is that it's gradual. Why is it gradual? Passability isn't gradual - either the unit can go there or it can't. Full-speed-to-slowdown should be gradual, but slow-vs-impassable isn't gradual.

Until this (maybe) gets fixed:
You can use a test unit with slopeMod=0 to check your maps for pathing.
That gives very clear red/green borders with no gradient.

Same here, but I also see the point of the OP.

Here is an interesting footnote. The allterrains in evo have a slope tolerance of 60 iirc (which means they can quite literally go up 90 degree slopes), but still, slopemods actually do affect them. I consider this a feature, a really nice one for that matter, but I always thought it was curious. I assume that by setting a unit to 360 degree slope tolerance, the entire pathing map would be very green.

I don't see how it is a large problem. There is no gradient between passable and impassable, it clearly jumps from orange to solid red.

If it were an artistic endeavour I would not have chosen butt ugly colours.

You asked for improved colours because what we have is not clear enough to discern accurately, I provided a suggestion.

Green with a tint of blue: Because green means go in most cultures, and the blue differentiates it for colour blind people, look at the green in traffic lights

Purple: Because Orange is too close to red, and it's not that close to green

Dark red: because it contrasts heavily with the other two colours.

It also sets up dark as impassable and light as passable as a secondary mechanic for gauging passability, rather than relying purely on colour.

If I wanted an artistic alternative: I would draw an opaque red line around the impassable areas, with a 50% translucent red area covering anything that wasn't impassable or totally passable.



Whatever helps colour blind people normally helps people who aren't colour blind. In this case it's the dual scheme of colour and luminosity.

Of note:

https://github.com/spring/spring/blob/d ... r.cpp#L168

imo not clear enough: the difference is noticeable but only if you know know there is one and see the colors side by side.

^^ yeah, that makes a lot more sense tbh

+1 from me to knorkes suggestion also.

(AF's is fine too but I guess would require more engine dev time)