Page 1 of 2
Soo, Peace must be obtained -
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 18:55
by Snipawolf
Wondering what you guys think..
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 18:59
by Relative
I'm pro war. If there was no concept of war there would be no SPRING!!! We would end up playing barbie adventures!! Also, war is an abstract concept, so if you want to, you can pretend it doesn't exist because it doesn't. Peace is pretty boring in a narrative. No plot driving conflict = poor book sales
More war less peace!
[/senseless ramblings]
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 19:04
by T1Deadeye64
Relative wrote:I'm pro war. If there was no concept of war there would be no SPRING!!! We would end up playing barbie adventures!! Also, war is an abstract concept, so if you want to, you can pretend it doesn't exist because it doesn't. Peace is pretty boring in a narrative. No plot driving conflict = poor book sales
[/rant]
+1 only ill play barbie racing
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 20:22
by rattle
I'm pro nuclear holocausts.
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 20:34
by Guessmyname
You can't obtain peace without war! If you've got no war then you've already got peace!
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 22:25
by SwiftSpear
peace won't be obtained through human means alone.
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 22:42
by FoeOfTheBee
SwiftSpear wrote:peace won't be obtained through human means alone.
I, for one, would welcome our new alien overlords.
Posted: 24 Dec 2006, 23:06
by Snipawolf
SwiftSpear wrote:peace won't be obtained through humane means alone.
There ya go, I fixed it
Posted: 25 Dec 2006, 08:07
by Neddie
Peace is an abstract concept while war is a facet of human existance. I contend that peace shall not reign while man endures, or indeed while life endures. However, I do support a drive to approximate a peaceful state.
Posted: 25 Dec 2006, 10:51
by Comp1337
He already retuned like day before yesterday and posted in the forums.. I cant see what all this discussion is about tbh
Posted: 27 Dec 2006, 20:38
by Muzic
Viral warfare ftw. Kill millions and leave there pretty buildings intact.
Posted: 27 Dec 2006, 22:01
by Comp1337
Muzic wrote:Viral warfare ftw. Kill millions and leave there pretty buildings intact.
Dude dont be so crude, its the 2000s we use neutron bombs..
Posted: 27 Dec 2006, 22:20
by Snipawolf
Which one is easier to get is the key decision...
Posted: 27 Dec 2006, 23:25
by jackalope
i'm pretty sure I don't understand any of the posts in this thread, and I'm very sure that they are all dumb.
Posted: 27 Dec 2006, 23:51
by Muzic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb
Wow, thats almost as good as a Sith Force Bomb.
Posted: 28 Dec 2006, 03:27
by Kixxe
Meh, peace will never happen. Humans will always battle over resources.
What we can do is lower the amount of wars, and casulties...
Posted: 28 Dec 2006, 04:48
by Peet
Kixxe wrote:Meh, peace will never happen. Humans will always battle over the transfer of consciousness to machines.
Fix't.
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 02:17
by SpikedHelmet
It should be "the transfer of consciousness from flesh to machines".
Haha you botched your joke and nobody found it funny as a result.
Anyway, voted peace through war. When one segment of society is hell-bent on violence, including violently protecting their violent way of life, the only course of action will be to violently oppose them.
vive le resistance d'Iraq!
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 02:58
by maestro
Peace will happened after a NUKE war....
because after 5538 (or such number) of 300kT warhead hit any single place on earth there is no human exist for another war...
Posted: 01 Jan 2007, 10:19
by KDR_11k
Peace will be obtained by not posting stupid polls.