Page 1 of 7

Politics.. I know.... but blah.. its important.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 17:19
by LathanStanley
If you guys are watching TV.

Whats his face in Korea, yeah, he said that if we impose economic sanctions, they will consider it an act of war...

Guess what.. we WILL! sanction them. Its our duty to do so as the global police we are...

In consequence, they threaten us and oour allies in the region... hah


Bush is saying right now that we "Will not tolerate their threats of war!"

we are mobilizing armed forces and stepping up defenses, including anti-ballastic missles in S Korea.

"We have no intention to invade" we aren't going to attack, unless provoked, or under the need to disarm them.

needless to say, if that F'er in N Korea dosen't learn to shut his mouth, we're going to kick him in the teeth.



"They want to plot and plan, control our resources, and attack us again.."
-Bush

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:00
by Zoombie
Why don't people just try and get along? Its really not that hard. Step One: DON'T attack people. Step Two: CONTINUE NOT Attacking people.

Its easy. Not doing something should be far easier then doing it...and we all know how lazy people are...

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:05
by LathanStanley
its one thing for us to ATTACK someone... its another to be provoked into, and then be attacked for non-violent retaliation...


if we do attack them, though it won't be anytime soon, if it ever happens... they asked for it.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:07
by Zoombie
I was actually talking of everyone, not just America in particular.

And I have the sinking feeling that N. Korea might be crazy enough to actually USE their new toy...

But maybe I've been playing too much DefCon.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:09
by LathanStanley
why the hell do you think we decided to move some our TOP OF THE LINE, TOP SECRET, multi-million dollar Patriot missles over there in less than a week?? :wink:

the crazy fools are going to shoot one, and well... we're going to whoop their ass when they do.

If they fire a nuke, wether if it successfully detonates on its target or not...

Expect a full-scale war, invasion, and removal of ANY power in that country.

End of discussion.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:10
by Zoombie
And yet, I'm sure somewhere in this planet, someone will be thinking its our fault...

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:11
by LathanStanley
I know, it'll be the damn tree huggin democrats.. :P

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:13
by Zoombie
Oh don't be too hard on them tree huggers. Their heart's are in the right place...its just their brains, thats the problem...

I'm actually a democrat. Only difference is I'm a very moderate democrat. In fact...I'm not a democrat, I'm a moderate (which is a new party that I made up RIGHT NOW!). Moderates are people who think that the Reb's and the Dem's both have good ideas and bad ideas and we need to root through the big idea pile, find the good one's from both sides, and then put them to use.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:16
by rattle
I wouldn't mind some nuke swapping between USA and Korea as long as the fallout and consequences stay on your side of the world.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:17
by LathanStanley
well yeah, when the lines blur between democrats and republicans as much as they have.. large party movements happen... it's been predicted that a LARGE new party should arise by 2012...

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:18
by Decimator
I would mind very much nuke swapping with NK. Also keep in mind that NK and Iran trade weapon and missile technology. Plus Japan also happens to be right next door. The entire western economy would tank if something happened to Japan.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:21
by LathanStanley
hopefully nobody has to fire nukes, and hopefully even more, we don't even consider it... it would cause too much of a moral dellima..

if one is fired though, hopefully we can shoot it down, and put an END to any futher agression in a swift manner.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:22
by rattle
PS: I was kidding, actually nuclear weapons should be banned and... err.. dumped. Somewhere, perhaps in space. After invading the countries who refuse to. Period. It's just sad that we already have the power to wreck this planet more than once.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:26
by Zoombie
There were enough nukes between the US and the USSR to light every square inch of the earth on FIRE five times over.

Now take some of those and give them to a radical group of a religion who believe that dying for the cause (and taking out several Christians at the same time) will get you a straight ticket to heaven no matter what.

And whats worse is these people seem to have equated the West with Christianity, even thought half the people in my neighborhood are a mish mash of Buddhists, atheists, Muslims, Jews and I-don't-careists.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:26
by LathanStanley
its actually probably still a good idea to store them somewhere...

you.. just... never know...

but yeah, to use them on ourselves, now that we know what they do... is retarted.

to use a nuke as means of persuasion, is, weak.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:27
by Decimator
Rattle, as long as uranium exists, we will have nuclear weapons. This is because if we, as western civilization, don't, they, the islamofascists, and the puny dictators, will. A puny dictator stops being so puny when he can wipe out a city. It would not be hard to deliver a nuclear weapon either, all it takes is someone willing to die, or even someone who just doesn't look at their cargo.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:28
by Zoombie
This topic is quickly making my day even more depressing, as I'm stuck at home with a splitting headach and sorethroat...

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:41
by rattle
Yeah. I know (and get your point). This may sound strange but bombing those countries back to the stonage is not the worst idea. Though I hardly doubt Russia and the USA could get on an even level with removing their nuclear weapons, ever, even if there's no other threat.

Cheer up zombie, go play that game where you shoot nukes around 8)

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:51
by Decimator
Russia and the USA could annihilate eachother, and that's why we don't have to worry. Putin is not insane, unlike Kim Jong Il.

Posted: 11 Oct 2006, 18:56
by rattle
Yes I know, they're reasonable men, but they won't be there forever...
I think most of the north korean population got the worst fate if it escalates.