Page 1 of 3
AF COOKIEBOT HAS NO PLACE SPAMMING IN THE MAIN
Posted: 11 Aug 2006, 21:07
by ee
about the triviaroom or how many cookies or bananas it gave to someone
whos isnt even logged on....how long before another idiot decides he wants to autospam main too?
anyway, it needs to stop with a long mute or ban or af being told to
STOP SPAMMING THE MAIN.
Posted: 11 Aug 2006, 21:12
by iamacup
it hardly spams main, it tells you when cookies are taken off and stuff and i use it to advertise the league,
you create alot of useless spam urself, mainly related to supernoob
POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK

Posted: 11 Aug 2006, 21:13
by ee
we already have a message of the day for announcement purposes.
and cookies? what cookies? spam and does it NEED to be purple ALL THE TIME?
Posted: 11 Aug 2006, 21:54
by iamacup
because my league is not official it wont get MOTD status, and thus noone will know about it if a certain level of advertisement is not used.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 00:21
by ee
we dont need no damn spam in main, especially not in purple, and 2 lines at a time
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 01:30
by hrmph
This thread is spam... Admit it, you don't even care about 'spam' in the lobby, you just came here to make trouble and start drama.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 01:42
by mongus
you spam main ee.
this is oftopic or lobby btw.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 04:29
by Neddie
Yeah, hypocritical tripe at its best.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 09:23
by Hellspawn
neddiedrow wrote:Yeah, hypocritical tripe at its best.
Got to love them.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 12:01
by hawkki
I must agree! no bots belong in the main chat. NONE.
What about when other people start putting their bots in main? Where is the line how much the bot may post? A full-sized trivia ongoing ? Or just cookie stats ?
private channels are for that, keep #main strictly as user discussion!
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 12:19
by AF
That's why i have disabled a lot of the pm'ing notifications on cookiebot and intend to remove pm'ing on gaining cookiebots when I have my nxt system online.
And there are cookie moderator commands for muting and unmuting cookiebot in channels and they're used a lot more than you'd think.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 12:50
by Drone_Fragger
hawkki wrote:I must agree! no bots belong in the main chat. NONE.
What about when other people start putting their bots in main? Where is the line how much the bot may post? A full-sized trivia ongoing ? Or just cookie stats ?
private channels are for that, keep #main strictly as user discussion!
Okay, Betalord, Remove Chanserv please, I'd like to see how long the channels last without a Cahnserv.
Also, its about 1 line per 10 minutes. Spam? I think not. I make more posts a day than I see it advertising anything.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 13:13
by AF
cookiebot does more like 10 lines an hour, and the vast majority of lines are in #trivia
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 13:23
by Machiosabre
ee's afraid that robots will have much greater spamming capabilities then he could possibly imagine and he'll be made obsolete.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 20:01
by iamacup
ee himself is a source of spam...... lets be right.
/fail
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 21:00
by Neddie
AF wrote:cookiebot does more like 10 lines an hour, and the vast majority of lines are in #trivia
I am trying to bring that up! You know, in #trivia.
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 23:23
by AF
hrmph ahs bene in #trivia so much, he's at 800 cookies now having onyl won the cookie lottery which si 90 cookies in tiself
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 23:55
by Felix the Cat
you create alot of useless spam urself, mainly related to supernoob
POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK
Admit it, you don't even care about 'spam' in the lobby, you just came here to make trouble and start drama.
you spam main ee.
this is oftopic or lobby btw.
Yeah, hypocritical tripe at its best.
ee's afraid that robots will have much greater spamming capabilities then he could possibly imagine and he'll be made obsolete.
ee himself is a source of spam...... lets be right.
/fail
Argumentum ad hominem. (now working)
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, 23:59
by AF
untrue, why should we support a spammers request to stop something spamming despite inconclusive evidence to support the spammers claims and the hypocrosy of the spammer complaining about spamming?
Posted: 13 Aug 2006, 00:01
by AF
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
A better description, and the url works unlike the one posted.
Although you are partially correct with ad homminem