Page 1 of 1

Nano particles need to move faster

Posted: 17 Apr 2005, 04:45
by Caydr
Subject says it all. They need to move at least 2-3x faster. Agree/disagree?

Posted: 17 Apr 2005, 06:06
by Neuralize
Tighter stream too. We sound like Urologists.

Posted: 17 Apr 2005, 06:58
by Sean Mirrsen
Well, until the stream becomes yellow, we shouldn't worry about urology...

I say do what TA did and have the stream width be dependant on the size of the unit being built, like the radius that is anyways used.

Posted: 17 Apr 2005, 19:23
by Caydr
If you watch the intro, there's a really good example of how nano particles "should" look in the real world. Now, while I think it'd be cool if it was dependant on the size of the unit, I think - while unrealistic or whatever - that it looks COOL when the spray is slightly beyond the size of the unit. It looks like these nano particles are... hairspray or something :P Well anyway, looked cool to me, what do you think?

Posted: 17 Apr 2005, 20:36
by PauloMorfeo
I guess it would be nice also, if the nano spray was the color of the armies side...!?

Posted: 17 Apr 2005, 21:53
by AF
Keep the nano spray green otherwise add the colour thing as an option. But do allow us to mod the effect

Posted: 17 Apr 2005, 22:58
by Tangaroa
For OTA at least, it should remain green, but the particules should probably be smaller and more numerous, more like a spray rather than sporadic fuzzballs.

Posted: 18 Apr 2005, 00:10
by Wolfy
Or best of all make it definable as per weapons. Rate per second of generation, spread, color, fit to target, speed, etc.

Posted: 18 Apr 2005, 17:42
by Gabba
To me, the current nano effects look good. And they look better than in TA.

Posted: 18 Apr 2005, 17:47
by Mars Keeper
Gabba wrote:To me, the current nano effects look good. And they look better than in TA.
Agree´s.

Posted: 18 Apr 2005, 21:31
by AF
Yah so things can only get better

Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 15:05
by zwzsg
Current nanospray, as seen in video15, looks very fine to me. No I don't want them to go faster, or be tinier. They look very good as they are.

Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 18:09
by Caydr
Look at video 16, at 1:45. I'm not complaining or anything, I'm just saying... it's probably a simple variable to change, and as it stands it doesn't resemble OTA. I'm fine with them being sort of fuzzy looking, unlike the hard square shapes from TA, but if you compare OTA and Spring, they move at completely different speeds.

I wouldn't whine about something so trivial if it was something that would be hard to change, honest.