Page 1 of 1

Need anti-air or anti-air-looking units for AA

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 00:03
by Caydr
Finally decided to cave in and try to add a balanced L2 anti-air kbot to AA. But I can't find any that don't look like crap. Any suggestions? Even if the unit isn't currently an anti-air unit, I can make it one... I just want it to be visually appealing really, I can do the rest on my own. (I could make them from scratch but that would take a long time and I'd like to have them in 1.42)

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 00:14
by Chocapic
what about the conversation over that in the past about making ppl going through diferent plant types to have all they wanted ?

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 00:30
by Caydr
Well, this unit would be nothing compared to a real flakker tank, just a longer ranged crasher-type thing with a bit of extra firepower.

I don't really think it's needed, but a lot of people were asking...

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 00:50
by hrmph
I imagine a tank with large treads and the head of a Raven from XTA. Atleast I think thats the name of that terrain-only-firing kbot. Or a kbot with the same head but a differing body. Just my 2 cents,

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 00:51
by Masse
but he wants kbot :wink:

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 00:56
by Corncobman
You could try the Pom-Pom from Terror Maps and Units

Image

http://tmu.tauniverse.com/?p=units

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 01:04
by Chocapic
Caydr wrote:Well, this unit would be nothing compared to a real flakker tank, just a longer ranged crasher-type thing with a bit of extra firepower.

I don't really think it's needed, but a lot of people were asking...
its not that im opposed to the flak kbot , i like it but ive seen a lot of the "we dont need that" :P
Just make it not very powerfull (less powerfull then the mobile flak from the adv vehicle plant)

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 08:33
by Caydr
I"m not going to bother with the idea in 1.42 after all. Even the very best ones I've found or had people show me are positively hideous.

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 09:30
by Decimator
Heh, I tried. :P

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 10:31
by FrostySalamander
That Pom-Pom looked great for a flak bot.

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 18:02
by Caydr
The only problem with it is that it's missing a midsection. It was designed strongly with OTA in mind, meaning that anything you can't see in OTA is not there. It basically has no torso, just a big gaping hole.

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 20:42
by Kelson
Not everything players beg you for is a good idea to add. Players rarely know what is best for them - hell, most would like to pump out orcones from a l1 lab and duke it out that way.

I go kbot fairly often and rarely, if ever, have a problem dealing with air. An adv con kbot with farks can build more than enough flak (and on the core side, a group of freakers) - and if I really need roving antiair, I'll pick up l1/l2 fighters to deal with them. The mobile flaks are pretty garbage as of now anyhow. That is, after all, why people often kill them with brawlers.

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 20:46
by Chocapic
I think its sorta "usefull" so to speak, in some very specific situations when you dont want to spend res doing another plants and want a moving flak on the fly (and it would be cheaper then the flakker).

Posted: 24 Jan 2006, 21:10
by Caydr
Ah but people so dislike being told they don't know what's best for them :roll:

Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 10:43
by aspa
I want an AA kbot that looks like this:

[edit]seems they removed the pic. The original page is http://world.guns.ru/machine/mg08-e.htm
OK put the image on my page:
Image
[/edit]

It would shoot bullets instead of flak... or maybe rapid fire weak flak shells. A cheap or fast-to-build unit that's supposed to be used in groups.

Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 17:03
by FizWizz
aspa wrote:I want an AA kbot that looks like this:

Image

It would shoot bullets instead of flak... or maybe rapid fire weak flak shells. A cheap or fast-to-build unit that's supposed to be used in groups.
omfg teh pwnz0rz!!!
oh wait, I don't see anything...

Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 17:34
by Decimator
The white box of dewm!

Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 21:14
by forbidin
You can prob take some RUMAD units from MADTA. They have a few rocket kbots that could be used to fire AA missles in volleys (like the AA ships)

Posted: 26 Jan 2006, 01:33
by Corncobman
Caydr wrote:The only problem with it is that it's missing a midsection. It was designed strongly with OTA in mind, meaning that anything you can't see in OTA is not there. It basically has no torso, just a big gaping hole.
Just ask the guys at TAU to see if they can remodel it. Quite a few people are still making units. The original unit creators might still be there.

Posted: 26 Jan 2006, 14:14
by aGorm
Whats wrong with aspa image? have you tryed right clicking and going properties and nicking teh url. If it don't show i suggest you do that.

Acctull I quite like the idea of a rapid fire gun style one. would be a nice point of difference. and would look kinda cool, like the sort of crazy 1 man army guys you get in films with two machine guns under each arm...

aGorm