Page 1 of 1

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 08:06
by Forboding Angel
Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 08:43
by jamerlan
Forboding Angel wrote:Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good idea

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 09:12
by Forboding Angel
You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 09:58
by jamerlan
Forboding Angel wrote:You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
then nobody will have even read access to it except ba devs. Also, private repos cost money

Re: trac <-> github ?

Posted: 18 Aug 2015, 10:34
by Silentwings
is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good idea
???? See the bugtracker for the actual difficulties.
I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac... You do know that each user can have a private github repo
No one has rolled their own anything, it's a vanilla trac install. Aside from the rather bizarre trend of people wanting to micro-manage someone else's project - using a private repository would hurt development and (if I understood them correctly) violate most of our own licenses.

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 04:18
by Forboding Angel
jamerlan wrote:
Forboding Angel wrote:Seriously... Put it on github. I don't understand why you would want to roll your own trac.
is this project opensource? I guess not really. So posting it on public github repo is not a good idea
jamerlan wrote:
Forboding Angel wrote:You do know that each user can have a private github repo, right?
then nobody will have even read access to it except ba devs. Also, private repos cost money
Replaced large image with link. (Silentwings).

Every github user gets one free private repo.
Silentwings wrote:No one has rolled their own anything, it's a vanilla trac install.
That would be rolling your own trac -_-

Re: BAR repo moving + content license

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:13
by Silentwings
Every github user gets one free private repo.
Link please? Could use this for a non-Spring project, https://github.com/pricing says otherwise.

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:25
by Jazcash
If you still have your student email you can get 5 free private repos :P

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:28
by Silentwings
Very funny, I hope you're enjoying yourself :wink:

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:33
by gajop
You can always use Bitbucket if you want free Git or Mercurial repositories. The main benefit of Github (social-collaborative features) are lost when using a private repository anyway.
PS: I'm pretty sure BA(R) is open source, not sure what you're talking about. And also, Github's Public repository doesn't mandate a license, especially not one for Art which is where BAR is a little bit different.

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 09:46
by Forboding Angel
It's a 31k image, stop abusing your mod powers.

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 15:35
by abma
Forboding Angel wrote:It's a 31k image, stop abusing your mod powers.
Silentwings is moderator in this subforum, so it is fine, i've closed your report. i guess "large" references to the image dimensions (~600x630)

imo the image is argueable. (offtopic, possible breaks someones privacy, also the source is unknown / license unknown -> possible a license viloation when embedding here without asking the photographer)

(if someone responds to this, topic needs to be split again, its again very offtopic, also thats a reason to not use such images: threads go offtopic very fast with them)

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 21:33
by Forboding Angel

Re: BAR repo moving + content license (split "Seriously... Put it on github")

Posted: 19 Aug 2015, 22:14
by gajop
The issue isn't the image itself, it's that you're undoing mod actions.