Page 1 of 2
test
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 01:54
by tanelorn
test
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 02:14
by Zoombie
Why are you testing?
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 04:28
by [K.B.] Napalm Cobra
Whether or not we'll be foolish enough to post in the thread?
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 05:15
by Kuroneko
we failed! D:
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 06:03
by SwiftSpear
STD results show positive. Sorry tanelorn.
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 06:28
by FizWizz
test
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 06:48
by Sheekel
test
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 14:04
by SinbadEV
TOAST!
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 15:10
by aGorm
├é┬┐qu├â┬®?
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 15:41
by Maelstrom
The Toast need some
JAM

Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 17:02
by Durandal
Og sådan vil vi hver en nat/
og siden vil jeg huske at/
Bede om minderne tilba'/
Hold mig nu en nat/
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 19:41
by PauloMorfeo
aGorm wrote:├é┬┐qu├â┬®?
That sounds Faulty Towers to me.
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 19:53
by Kixxe
Woa, a new spam treahd.
*Ehum!*
''Testing testing, 1 2 1 2.
Alright, now is the qwestion, what to test?
I mean, i can't just test something as useless as just testing for the sake of testing! That would not make sense!
Even so, many pepole have depried their sence of dignity and logic and just tested for sake of testing. I can see the reson for toast in this madness.
Back to what i should test... What is a ''test'' anyway? How do i test something. Bye the book, test means ''trying out'' something. Trying so that something works, or how something is. An expriment of some sort.
EURKA!
Im gonna go ''test'' some spring. Hope you guys has fun =P
Kixxe > you
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 22:19
by Archangel of Death
Ok, here is my logic behind this:
So based upon that evidence:
me > Kixxe > you
[On a completely offtopic sidenote, perhaps tanelorn was testing whether he could post. It is possible browser issues could have been stopping him before, which he was seeing if he had resolved. Now this would seem require the creation of a new thread since it wouldn't be appropriate to spam someone elses thread with it (and why put effort into a real post for a thread when there is a good chance it will be lost forever) and we didn't have any active "spam" threads going at the time (unless you count the one about emmanuel).
Now this is the interesting part, if this postulation is correct then tanelorn > me > Kixxe, and therefore, > you.]
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 22:25
by SinbadEV
you missed a '('
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 22:35
by Archangel of Death
Not really... I'll upgrade some to brackets to clear that up...
Posted: 15 Sep 2005, 22:44
by SinbadEV
oops... my bad
Posted: 16 Sep 2005, 00:50
by aGorm
or possibly not...
Posted: 16 Sep 2005, 01:53
by Weaver
how testy...
Posted: 16 Sep 2005, 05:43
by GrOuNd_ZeRo
1. A procedure for critical evaluation; a means of determining the presence, quality, or truth of something; a trial: a test of one's eyesight;
subjecting a hypothesis to a test; a test of an athlete's endurance.
2. A series of questions, problems, or physical responses designed to determine knowledge, intelligence, or ability.
3. A basis for evaluation or judgment: ├óÔé¼┼ôA test of democratic government is how Congress and the president work together├óÔé¼┬Ø (Haynes Johnson).
4. Chemistry.
a. A physical or chemical change by which a substance may be detected or its properties ascertained.
b. A reagent used to cause or promote such a change.
c. A positive result obtained.
5. A cupel.
TEST
