Spring RTS Engine

its leaked and holy shit, it is ace. If you liked CoD4 and was disappoint by CoD5 (as all true gentlemen were), then fear no more, because CoD6 is the fist of Jesus into the noose of game design.

It's leaked for Xbox 360 (and if you are dumb enough to go online you'll get a machine ban), not for PC yet afaik.

Wasn't CoD 5 considered top notch?
what didn't you like about CoD5 and how is it different in CoD 6?

console trash...

its going to have no dedicated server support what a load of bollox

BAWWWW its not going to be moddable, or have dedicated servers.

QQ more PC gamers.

It's your own fault for using your hardware to rip these games.


COD 5 , or world at war as its called, was utter shit, and should never have come after COD4, it was a step backwards in graphics, gameplay, and theme.

Call of duty should stay in modern warfare as they have played out every world war 2 and 1 scenario known to man.

yeah, they should go to post modern and futuristic warfare imo. WWIII

modern warfare is where they should stay :)

modability is not really important.

But an FPS with no dedicated server support is a joke. The amount of people who have cancelled there pre orders and have even petitioned online cos of it will really hurt the dev's pocket.

I found 5 to be enjoyable in it's own way.

It looks really good, especially the amount of weapons, and the spec op (co-op) mode. But the no dedi servers just pisses me off. But it will still sell a ludicrous amount of copies, and I'll probably still buy it, it just wont be as good as it could of been.

people had no issues hosting in cod4/cod5 why the need for dedicated servers?

smoth wrote:people had no issues hosting in cod4/cod5 why the need for dedicated servers?

there isnt a reason, they just like something to complain about, if i recall about 90% of all the servers i played on(PC) were hosted by someone else.

finished the game already, its dead short (>8 hours). still, v. v. kickass (except those fucking militia levels...) the genocide in the airport* is the best bit.

*spoiler

Put the spoiler notice before the spoiler, not after.

What irritated me in CoD5 was the ridiculous amount of grenades thrown at me in the hardest difficulty. How do they know exactly where behind the wall I am? I just walk past a wall while grenades continuously land behind my back.

This also happened in CoD4 but not that much.

Grenade icon = Icon of death (If you clearly see it. You know that you're about to die.)

Call of duty should stay in modern warfare as they have played out every world war 2 and 1 scenario known to man.

CoD should have died after CoD2
and I can't remember any FPS about WW1. At all.

You mean going through barbwires while being shot at by machine-guns and rifles or just sitting in trenches sniping the enemy and avoiding mustard gas?

Pendrokar wrote:You mean going through barbwires while being shot at by machine-guns and rifles or just sitting in trenches sniping the enemy and avoiding mustard gas?

There were tanks in WW1.
Plus you had cavalry!!
How cool would it be to ride a horse towards machine gun fire?

Horses aren't bulletproof so that's only cool for like 3 seconds.

Of course everybody knows WW1 would be massively improved with giant robots...

KDR_11k wrote:Horses aren't bulletproof so that's only cool for like 3 seconds.

Of course everybody knows WW1 would be massively improved with giant robots...

You could strap some heavy armor on your horse.