Spring RTS Engine

Well, we are pretty used to maschinery, replacing the dangerous, hazard and monoton labour. But what if they are able to replace, inventiv jobs, scientific jobs, if maschines were good artists?

I came across to mutch of that lately, musicprograms who can improvise pretty good Jazz, who help to compose music, carengineering software that optimizes parts on its own..

What if software learns to use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRIZ ?

Anyone ever thought about it? I mean IT no longer needing us?

Machines*

Like autogramma- and typocorrectors, making even the nazis workless

Consida my typos a sort of social security, to make yourself not feel worthless

That's why I love speeking 1337 so much. You can't make typos.

Even though machines can produce some cool looking art, I doubt it would be quite the same thing as something produced by a human. The art work done by a human would be valuable as well, in it's own way, even if it ends up not being as popular as art work produced by a machine. I think that it would be sad to not have cool looking things like hand made gargoyle sculptures or well designed butterfly sanctuaries with statues, flowers, and areas where the butterflies can march around in circles and perform their puddling behaviors.

So there is hope? Maybee we should add a fourth law of Robotics
4. I shall not do Art, no matter what.

No, I don't think that we should do something like that.

I don't think that a robot could be just like the artist in this article, though: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524841.700

wow.
google for "Armagan blind" for some images, thats amazing.

a painting by a blind man?

in tv (ye rly tv, like 20 p.m) i saw program about 2 doods painting... one was using his poop second his penis to paint... im wondering who was buyng their... 's**t' D:

knorke wrote:wow.
google for "Armagan blind" for some images, thats amazing.

Wow, he has a mutation that caused him to be born without eyes and out did Filippo Brunelleschi, a Renaissance architect who lived 600 years ago and who's layouts are often messed up when other artists try to copy him. So, that's pretty cool, seeing also involves the sense of touch.

One of his paintings:

What if someone makes an AI that will beat all human players in BA? Or Starcraft??

And I have hard time believing that theres good improvised jazz.

Oh and arent photos better than paintings anyway.

JohannesH wrote:Oh and arent photos better than paintings anyway.

It's ok, we get it. You don't know how to accept the intrinsic value of paintings.

humans are basicly just complex machines made out of weird materials. i think it is inevitable that one day the machines we make will become better than us and wont need us any more like in matrix or terminator

ChaosMonkey wrote:humans are basicly just complex machines made out of weird materials. i think it is inevitable that one day the machines we make will become better than us and wont need us any more like in matrix or terminator

Oh, another danuker follower. No, machines will never be capable of actually thinking for themselves. Ever.

yes, but simple windows calculator is smarter than us and would pwn us all :<

Wombat wrote:yes, but simple windows calculator is smarter than us and would pwn us all :<

BUT CAN IT FIND X?

nobody is perfect, even Bill Gates or Me... :<

Wombat wrote:nobody is perfect, even Bill Gates or Me... :<

Chuck Norris.

omg u said the name of 'One-You-Know-Who'... u are so dead, even combomb wont save u....