Everybody unite!
Posted: 16 Jun 2009, 16:29
Opera Unite: a Web server on the Web browser
http://unite.opera.com/
http://unite.opera.com/
Open Source Realtime Strategy Game Engine
https://springrts.com/phpbb/
fypSpawn_Retard wrote:Looks good if i wanted to keep stuff secret, but firefox is superior at consuming abnormally large amounts of memory.
Opera/chromefagFelix the Cat wrote:fypSpawn_Retard wrote:Looks good if i wanted to keep stuff secret, but firefox is superior at consuming abnormally large amounts of memory.
FirefagRegret wrote:Opera/chromefagFelix the Cat wrote:fypSpawn_Retard wrote:Looks good if i wanted to keep stuff secret, but firefox is superior at consuming abnormally large amounts of memory.
Hahaha say whatFelix the Cat wrote:To illustrate:
-Latest Opera version with 11 tabs open, including a fully-loaded YouTube video: 188,876K memory usage.
-Latest Firefox version with 2 tabs open, neither of which are resource-intensive pages: 240,960K memory usage.
Why does Firefox need 27% more memory to do 80% less stuff?
Just to prove that it's not the couple add-ons I have running, I disabled all of my Firefox add-ons. That brought Firefox memory usage down to 232K. That's still a whole lot.
The only reason I use Firefox at all is that some pages use scripts that don't work with Opera. That and the add-ons are useful for some tasks. But for everyday Web usage, Opera is far superior.
Do you happen to have a lot of RAM? Firefox uses as much as it can IIRC. On my crappy 512MB RAM thing, it uses about 220mb for ~30 tabs from a load of different sites. Youtube/Flash stuff causes it to go up a lot though. Chrome is the worst for RAM usage I've found though.Felix the Cat wrote:To illustrate:
-Latest Opera version with 11 tabs open, including a fully-loaded YouTube video: 188,876K memory usage.
-Latest Firefox version with 2 tabs open, neither of which are resource-intensive pages: 240,960K memory usage.
Why does Firefox need 27% more memory to do 80% less stuff?
Just to prove that it's not the couple add-ons I have running, I disabled all of my Firefox add-ons. That brought Firefox memory usage down to 232K. That's still a whole lot.
The only reason I use Firefox at all is that some pages use scripts that don't work with Opera. That and the add-ons are useful for some tasks. But for everyday Web usage, Opera is far superior.
Minefield is very promising, but I'm sticking to Chrome until Firefox looks more like Minefield - Firefox performance is just bad these days.Otherside wrote:the new firefox beta runs lighter than the memory hog that firefox is atm.
it might be the heaviest browser but imo its the best.
the newest versions of I.E are not bad and im looking forward to chrome being developed further it might eventually be my browser of choice as google are good at integrating all there tools together
I dont rate opera i find other browsers way better.
True dat, but Safari comes with Apple systems and Firefox comes with Ubuntu and other Linux distros and I can imagine Chrome coming with Google's OS when they finally release one. But yeh, if Windows aren't porting IE with Windows 7, then the Browser battle will shift a lot.Otherside wrote:I.E is only top because its the default browser that comes with windows