Question
Moderator: Moderators
- Felix the Cat
- Posts: 2383
- Joined: 15 Jun 2005, 17:30
Re: Question
Yeah, I think a smaller game would be better, with people who are actually going to participate. WW is no fun when >50% of the players aren't playing.
Re: Question
I love you lurkerJAZCASH wrote:Count me out for the next game. Lurker is breaking everything.
So who were the wolves anyway?
- Spawn_Retard
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: 21 Dec 2006, 14:36
Re: Question
Lurker was a wolf, and he dodged the bullet the first time, because apparently felix did not count the votes against him.
Also, this is failboat, why did you re the game?
i know there was unactive players because not everyone is aware it started after being idle for so long.
I'm having second thoughts about this game if people are just going to rage quit or re the game because not everyone is vote ect.
Also, this is failboat, why did you re the game?
i know there was unactive players because not everyone is aware it started after being idle for so long.
I'm having second thoughts about this game if people are just going to rage quit or re the game because not everyone is vote ect.
Re: Question
The game doesn't work unless everyone is participating.
Re: Question
My bad, I havent been at the forums because everyone seems to hate me every time I post. I also expected a a post called "The Village" where we could vote for someone to be lynched.
Re: Question
Only three people voted for me, and then two of them changed votes.Spawn_Retard wrote:Lurker was a wolf, and he dodged the bullet the first time, because apparently felix did not count the votes against him.
Re: Question
growing a spine might helpMy bad, I havent been at the forums because everyone seems to hate me every time I post.
- DavetheBrave
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 22 Jun 2005, 02:52
Re: Question
I VOTED FOR LURKER EVERYTIEM [/capslock]
Re: Question
I kind of fell asleep and forgot the hole thing >.>