Page 1 of 1
consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 17:27
by emmanuel
need edit for be accurat legal and grammar:(contribute)
actually im sure that french law dont be compatible with others country for the folowing :
french sue denial and allow mind / personnal memory (without or after ended liscence own )and sharing with others for =info witness study related to suable or mankind own(named cultural) :
that allow the fan art without material stole ,
seems dont care about design (but denial law and witness request the true about intelectual propriety ),
french can copy indirectly by human memory only !
modding seem tolerated with original material (with mention to {sciences,schools,handicaped }needing to be understand accuratly )
these law are sensed alow the commerce with the world without mental restriction for personnal : the concept is about the mind VS the material
it seems
the usa law are international for the nonnuclear gov(for resume)
that
exclud = china russia greatbritain india sudcorea iran ...
special mention for the sued land in warcrime or crimeVShumanity =
germany japan serbia irak afganistan and lot of others not allowed to be aware of their history
the issue is actually related with the russia get to sue denial too ;
because the denial is the law for the sued land that mismatch with my land and the europa and the russia
im annoyed to this and dont know about the hosting land : seem that sweeden is freedom mind but ruled by international(usa) law ...
maybe a backup server or a legal study can teach us (or me if i the only to be missinformed)
the forum rule is understandable about the personnal activity but not about the material liscence(just a sentence about malicous that is not same in each land)
copy(!sic!) of the standard international law about software and art (can be aplied at evry design)

not legal in french for mental memory(privat but transmisible)
for syntese : fanart is alowed (only in french) for people
having see in public or under liscence ;
the folowing land have special law := china russia greatbritain india sudcorea iran ...(some africa and asia lands?)
for the rest of the (usa) world yu can only have mental data if yu own the related liscence and anyothers use is sued (talking about or promoting or copy or mod)
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 18:03
by Hoi
ban him.
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 18:08
by Forboding Angel
USA copyright law does not dominate all other countries as you seem to suggest, but assholes here try to make our Copyright laws apply everywhere and it's really fricking annoying.
RIAA being an example. The one shining light is thepiratebay who gets to pretty much cockslap the lawyers trying to enforce it in sweden (where there is no copyright law).
But you're saying that in france the only way you can create derrivative works is by memory of a public sighting? THat's kinda harsh O_o
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 18:08
by smoth
Why do you discuss this, the discussion is moot. Please stop.
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 18:10
by Peet
Forboding Angel wrote:RIAA being an example. The one shining light is thepiratebay who gets to pretty much cockslap the lawyers trying to enforce it in sweden (where there is no copyright law).
Eeuuuhhhh I think you may be overlooking the fact that they're currently on trial awaiting a verdict with numerous charges...in sweden?
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 18:36
by emmanuel
Peet wrote:Forboding Angel wrote:RIAA being an example. The one shining light is thepiratebay who gets to pretty much cockslap the lawyers trying to enforce it in sweden (where there is no copyright law).
Eeuuuhhhh I think you may be overlooking the fact that they're currently on trial awaiting a verdict with numerous charges...in sweden?
some have linked the french special rule in forum toppics where i read it : i suggest to studdy the possibilitty of a backup server in the folowing ?: russia , frenc , uk , india , china ;(the donation can be needed to study again ? :maybe by direct transfert to the provider for avoid issues ?)
the first answer is related to felonny Offences at my sense and the 2 follow at Misdemeanor (that i understanded here :
http://spring.clan-sy.com/phpbb/viewtop ... 84#p114984
the french law is new and have not being regulary applied due to lack of standard about the privat world of the mature personnal ( the max number of friends before public ?less than 7 seems)
i know a bit piratbay :before visiting i already knowed by probability statistic(cultural public) the content and the possibles issues ;
since 5 to 10 years some V.I.P people are sued for exemple (3jail/300k$)and law study :
sweeden obivously get in UE with the EU/usa standard alowind little native exception(school ,science ,medic)
i think in the USA its self each state have diferent details
for spring itself i feel that medium count(for a computer game) inlobby raise very slowly : but the 0.79 impressiv features can raise to K logged or more
the 0.79 and since the 0.64 if i remind is a science study STRATEGIC(not a play or game in this case ) related because spring is firstone at my search for RTS(better than cossacks engine ?)
agree that dev are aware or not to be mankind V.I.P ?(valuable for ip use in french:gov liscence)
the <7 per team can be studed too ?
for know i hav tiny contact without real dialog or feedback or info and im not aware for half or more of what the matter and if i hav hope to use my product only a time ...anoying one issue for me
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 20:02
by Forboding Angel
Peet wrote:Forboding Angel wrote:RIAA being an example. The one shining light is thepiratebay who gets to pretty much cockslap the lawyers trying to enforce it in sweden (where there is no copyright law).
Eeuuuhhhh I think you may be overlooking the fact that they're currently on trial awaiting a verdict with numerous charges...in sweden?
I only know vaugely what is going on with that.
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 20:05
by smoth
Let me ask these question then emmanuel.
Why do you need this info, as in are you worried about your project?
What is the concern?
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 20:06
by Hoi
[sarcasm]that someone will steal it and sell it and will make money from it[/sarcasm]
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 20:56
by emmanuel
yes yu match : that what for yu dont like me: i care about my personal related not for friends unusefull in my quest;
i was gifted to use spring and want gift back with usefull things :
where yu have totally wrong : i dont scare to be stoled but to be not stoled :that actually the case : none seems want to use what i made since 5years and im shamed;
but i see in lobby only BA then i think yu have this problem too :out of yur team :yu seems not fully alone at work;
i try to secure my work that need mandatory spring
and the futur will be better again if spring continue;
for the usa worker i have bad fill ,
europa claim is freedom on some details that can be helpfull,
by the new spring can be a science tools for school like linux but need avoid commercials
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 20:58
by Silentwings
I feel this needs to be showcased in a special edition of the Spring Quotes database.
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 21:03
by lurker
There is plenty of copyright law in Sweden, and there used to be no law against linking to copyright material, but now there might be, cue trial.
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 21:06
by emmanuel
Silentwings wrote:I feel this needs to be showcased in a special edition of the Spring Quotes database.
i claim since my first relase in ...200* 2/3 month after joining the forum : i think yu feel better than yu trust the sentence writed .
the french sue the hack of drm crypto but not the download of protected content;and the linking or the apology of the hacking soft(for use)content seems more relativ to uploader/host than to link :
french tv show today the jail of nativ per gov.fr for abuse outfrontline
Re: consideration about issue between country law
Posted: 11 Mar 2009, 21:23
by smoth
You are fine emmanuel if you making your own work. There is a sticking topic say what licenses are compatible with spring and how you can use them.
You are not doing fan related stuff so you are fine there.
You are not reproducing what is already made.
You can make what you want beyond that just check with the creator if you need to borrow content.
Other things to know are that if you see a PD license you are free to take, owner doesn't lose his work but you can use.
If unsure, always ask owner.