Page 1 of 1
Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 03:56
by Dragon45
^^
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 04:08
by MidKnight
56K WARNING! THIS GUY IS MISUNDERESTIMATING YOUS!!!11!11
lol, maybe in poorer countries?
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 06:21
by thesleepless
nope, but i played at 64k when capped with no issues.
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 13:00
by zerver
Bandwidth cap? that sucks

Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 13:51
by thesleepless
pretty standard in this country unfortunately
we've always been behind from what i understand
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 14:18
by AF
darkstars spring download site courtesy of google analytics:
Note that this does not cover the direct mirrors of JJs filesite
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 14:20
by Peet
Does that go by whois or download speed? If it's speed, what range is 'unknown' in?
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 14:28
by AF
Not sure, try googling
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 14:32
by Caradhras
/me wants OC3 155Mbit/s optical ultra speed
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 15:27
by imbaczek
OC3 is so yesterday. gimme at least GigE.
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 16:00
by Caradhras
whatever, give me something >> than 3000kbit/s ADSL
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 22:31
by clumsy_culhane
Ive played spring on 28 k, just. (I was capped from my usual speed of 512.. ) The internet prices/speeds are crazy here, we have worse internet than parts of africa

.
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 17:45
by Spawn_Retard
Pro Tip: move country and avoid living in countries that have filtered internet.
Re: Is anyone really still on 56K?
Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 18:02
by smoth
I always like to put that warning up as some people have to pay for bandwidth out the nose once they surpass their monthly limit