Page 1 of 2

"TekSavvy" Canadian ISP

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 04:57
by Caydr
I just started out with them but it's been hassle free and they're cheap. $30 a month and you get a good price on the modem (you can buy outright or rent to own)

http://www.teksavvy.com

They have an excellent reputation, I checked them out on DSLReports and a couple other sites.

Here's a few speed tests I just did:

Image
Image
Image
Image

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 05:07
by SwiftSpear
Image

Shaw internet in Vancouver.

[edit] I like the fact that they have a good upload rate. It's hard to find an ISP that caters to reasonable uploading. Some are ridiculous, good download rates but upload speeds that 56 modems can compete with.

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 05:10
by Caydr
Nice! How much is it though? Where do you live such that you can get such a good rate to Vancouver? (Waits for "Vancouver")

I don't have anything against Rogers (my current ISP) except that they filter torrent download speeds... horrrribly. I get all my TV through torrents mostly. I can't wait 2 weeks to watch the latest episode of something, you know?

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 12:06
by Comp1337
Caydr wrote:Nice! How much is it though? Where do you live such that you can get such a good rate to Vancouver? (Waits for "Vancouver")

I don't have anything against Rogers (my current ISP) except that they filter torrent download speeds... horrrribly. I get all my TV through torrents mostly. I can't wait 2 weeks to watch the latest episode of something, you know?
I hope the shows are not COPYRIGHTED?

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 13:49
by Lippy
Image

Image


My upload sucks :(

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 15:37
by AF
Image

*_*

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 15:47
by Mars
Image


8)

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 16:18
by Relative
UK Free Software Network reseller with entanet.

Image

I have a very poor Line Attenuation of 53 db.

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 17:23
by Caydr
Hackzrorzdid my modem a bit

Image

Mars, I wish we had networks over here like you guys get... I hear Sweden in particular has amazing speeds on the cheap.

Our phone companies have received grants from the government to put in fiber optic cable across North America... they spend it on nicer office chairs and stuff.

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 17:43
by HeavyLancer
Meh, I have cable with optus. I was surprised at the speeds I am supposedly getting:
Image

This is on a plan that costs something like ~$60 AU. I like it 8)

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 17:45
by lurker
Image

EAT THAT! I've got the most l337 7ub35 3V4R!!1!

>_>

<_<

:cry:

Oh and don't let it fool you. I don't get half that much upload when downloading anything.

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 18:08
by Relative
lurker wrote:Image
That just sucks ass. Even the FCC doesn't regard that as "boardband", and their standards are really low.
AF wrote:Image

*_*
You should really change your ISP AF, take a look at entanet's resellers such as UKFSN. Entanet is often regarded as one of the best providers.

http://www.ukfsn.org/

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 18:28
by Comp1337
rolf aol

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 18:30
by lurker
Relative wrote:That just sucks ass. Even the FCC doesn't regard that as "boardband", and their standards are really low.
Yeah, they call it wireless broadband, but it's this speed 99% of the time. It used to go a good bit faster every once in a while, and very rarely in the dead of night suddenly become a 2 megabit connection for half an hour. Apparently it's only broadband when no one else is using it...

I would think it was because of my distance from the tower were it not the fact that it's usually a 3/4 bars connection. I wonder if they've changed something since it never hits peaks anymore. Could I be throttled even when barely downloading anything? Maybe they don't like me staying connected 24/7?

Either way it's off to university with a very good connection in a month. 8)

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 18:36
by Snipawolf
I never get speeds close to this, I only get 300 kb/s DL, and 40 kb/s upload x____x

Image

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 18:47
by lurker
Snipawolf wrote:I never get speeds close to this, I only get 300 kb/s DL, and 40 kb/s upload x____x

Image
not to insult you, but you're talking about bits, right?

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 18:53
by Snipawolf
I am not quite sure.

A bit is 1/8 of a byte, so maybe..

Generally, if I read KB, I see KiloByte, not KiloBit.

So, if it is reading in bits, then maybe I am incorrect, and actually getting the correct speed.

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 18:59
by Comp1337
kB == kilobyte
kb == kilobit
There is a difference

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 19:00
by lurker
Snipawolf wrote:I am not quite sure.

A bit is 1/8 of a byte, so maybe..

Generally, if I read KB, I see KiloByte, not KiloBit.

So, if it is reading in bits, then maybe I am incorrect, and actually getting the correct speed.
In general, I think browsers, bittorent clients, etc. will use bytes, and bandwidth sellers will use bits.
And usually kb is bits and KB or kB is bytes.

Edit: ninja'd >_>
And storage manufacturers use thousands, millions, billions of bytes rather than going by 1024, screwing you out of a good percentage. >_<

Posted: 10 Aug 2007, 19:01
by Peet
KiB! Yay kibblebytes. Best unit evar.