Page 45 of 61
Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 16:10
by Warlord Zsinj
*glad he isn't doing a WWII mod*
*glad he can make up fluff when he needs it in-game >_>*
Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 16:19
by KingRaptor
So you can remove midichlorians from ever existing then?
<_<
Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 19:52
by Neddie
Just because they make every little story canon doesn't mean you can make up fluff whenever you want.
Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 20:19
by Guessmyname
Yes but because there's so many of them you can easily fool people. "This? Oh this was in, erm, the Rise of the Second Emperor, um, yeah...". "Oh, goodies! It's okay rabid fan-people! It's canon!"
(note: I made that title up)
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 05:51
by SpikedHelmet
Yay for Expanded Universe!
Anyway fuck off of our thread!
For the purposes of gameplay, I don't see there being much of a difference between HE and shrapnel. Besides, we can't get too deep into realism here. I mean, if we wanted to be totally realistic, we'd also factor in HEAT, shaped-charge warheads, HVAP, smoke rounds, air-burst ground artillery, submunitions, etc...
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 05:52
by SpikedHelmet
"Besides, we can't get too deep into realism here."
Did I just fucking say that?
*gunshot*
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 06:25
by Nemo
hah. so all my arguing with you hasn't been entirely in vain.
victory is mine.
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 07:59
by rattle
/me steamrolls Nemo with a pack of Tiger IIs
Speaking of which, I hope guys you don't forget about the tigers! :P
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 11:35
by Warlord Zsinj
HAY NO TIGERS? WTF?!?
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 12:01
by 1v0ry_k1ng
1v0ry_k1ng wrote:please model tiger soon :)
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 19:19
by Neddie
I actually say screw the Tiger, make me the Italians.
Of course, nobody, myself included, really wants the Italians ingame.
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 20:30
by 1v0ry_k1ng
put in stomping robosuit hitler as a secret unit!
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 21:38
by Felix the Cat
neddiedrow wrote:I actually say screw the Tiger, make me the Italians.
Of course, nobody, myself included, really wants the Italians ingame.
Untrue, I want Italians.
And Romanians, Hungarians, Bulgarians, Croatians, Slovakians, Finns, Vichy French, Japanese, Chinese, Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, South Africans, Free French, Yugoslavian Partisans (aka Tito), and more.
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 22:37
by yuritch
Most of those (except for the Japanese, Italians, French and Hungarians) will mostly have imported vehicles anyway. Not many countries could build tanks worthy of that name, you know... Only thing different will be the infantry (and most of those will use imported weapons anyway).
Posted: 11 Oct 2007, 23:23
by Felix the Cat
yuritch wrote:Most of those (except for the Japanese, Italians, French and Hungarians) will mostly have imported vehicles anyway. Not many countries could build tanks worthy of that name, you know... Only thing different will be the infantry (and most of those will use imported weapons anyway).
I was joking.
Sort of.
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 00:12
by SpikedHelmet
Felix the Cat wrote:neddiedrow wrote:I actually say screw the Tiger, make me the Italians.
Of course, nobody, myself included, really wants the Italians ingame.
Untrue, I want Italians.
And Romanians
Indistinguishable from German forces.
, Hungarians,
Same.
Bulgarians, Croatians, Slovakians, Finns,
Same, though either Soviet or German shit.
Vichy French
They didnt fight, their vehicles were confiscated by the Germans, the only thing they had was a small Navy which was blown up
, Japanese,
Die
[/quote]Chinese,[/quote]
they had like... nothing. just riflemen. millions of them.
Australians, Canadians, New Zealanders, South Africans, Free French
Just British with different voices, hardly worth it!
,
Yugoslavian Partisans (aka Tito)
Why the fuck do you think we have Partisans in there!!!
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 00:32
by Pressure Line
Felix the Cat wrote:Untrue, I want Italians.
i think i have some italian tank models, not 100% sure, will see what i can dig up :D
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 00:40
by Neddie
Actually, Spiked, your use of hyperbole is unwarranted. Where you say indistinguishable from, you should be saying "are similar to" - if you were to do so, you'd probably be correct.
A lot of these powers derived equipment from multiple peers and attempted to field their own. Some of them had distinct strengths which none of the major powers exhibited, though they had much more pronounced weaknesses.
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 01:13
by 1v0ry_k1ng
Some of them had distinct strengths which none of the major powers exhibited, though they had much more pronounced weaknesses.
the french for example had superior armour early in the war, but this was offset by their chronic lack of testes
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 01:33
by Felix the Cat
Romanians & Hungarians were distinguished from Germans like this:
-They made some of their own tanks;
-They made retreat at very bad times into a fine art.