Page 43 of 56

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 15:26
by Warlord Zsinj
Image

I find your lack of faith... disturbing.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 15:28
by smoth
oh noes, it's darth vader. Without los he cannot force choke me. So I am going to troll him.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 15:57
by manolo_
Warlord Zsinj wrote:Image

I find your lack of faith... disturbing.
darth vaders "power"

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 16:39
by smoth
hey darth, I like how you wear your underwear on the outside of your pants! So tell me, do you always catch for the emperor or do you hit that wrinkly ass from time to time?

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 27 Aug 2008, 17:40
by AF
It has a built in dish cloth

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 01:23
by Warlord Zsinj
People pick on darth because they know there is no more badass budguy. He owns you. You know it. He even has the most badass theme of all badguys.

Image

;)

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 01:35
by smoth
Image
darth vader had to have someone else speak for him because he was not badassed enough.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 01:44
by Warlord Zsinj
Image

James Earl Jones does not approve.


... ok, enough spam please :P

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 01:46
by smoth
Image
BASEBALL!
aw....


it isn't like you are posting delicious eyecandy for me :(

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 02:20
by Warlord Zsinj
Updated the first post of this thread to show most of the stuff posted.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 02:30
by smoth
I want NEW shots warlord...

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 02:33
by Warlord Zsinj
Do some textures for me :P

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 02:42
by smoth
no.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 03:02
by Warlord Zsinj
quitcher whinin' then ;)

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 03:09
by smoth
hey man, I am making eyecandy, just not for starwars... >:|

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 04:08
by Noruas
THATS A NICE BASEBALL REMIND ME TO QUOTE IT LATER!

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 14:49
by Elkvis
smoth wrote:mass still requires a large force to move even in a frictionless environment. So no.
In a frictionless environment, any small amount of force will effect movement on a mass. No matter how small and immeasurable.

A small moment of a small force is not going to do anything, but a small force over a long period of time will eventually accelerate the object. Hell, you could get an SD moving quite quickly, providing you did not mind abhorrently slow acceleration.

A Jedi could pull a heavy object down out of orbit providing they had any force pull effect over that distance, not at a whim, but after a long term concerted effort.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 14:51
by Machiosabre
im sure a giant ship can resist a small pull though.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 14:56
by Elkvis
I did say that any correction thrusters would totally ruin it.

But, not as a static object against a force applied over a long period of time.



I must add, that I am assuming that Jedi force pull does not require the whole equal and opposite reaction gambit, otherwise he would simply pull himself up into the ship.

Re: The Star Wars: Imperial Winter Eyecandy Thread [56k warning]

Posted: 28 Aug 2008, 15:05
by pintle
Elkvis wrote:I did say that any correction thrusters would totally ruin it.

But, not as a static object against a force applied over a long period of time.



I must add, that I am assuming that Jedi force pull does not require the whole equal and opposite reaction gambit, otherwise he would simply pull himself up into the ship.
And yoda would be crushed lifting the xwing outta the swamp on Dagobah