Spring RTS Engine

dunno bout u but i want to postpone my match against the legendary Gpox a while

Lol maybe gus but not if im not informed before hand
Gpox jusy beat me 3 or 4 times consecutivly in 1v1's! its those damn core rushing units the zippers that arm has no decent counter for that got me i almost had a good force at one point but he arrived 30 seconds to early for two sentinels to come online and i lost. Goodluck with him!

i saw the 1st 2 of those matches and if i'm fair, the zipper tactic does have an advantage indipendent of the quality of the player (although gpox is good :D) and it does seem very hard to counter...

Hey whenever this damn thing starts someone email me or IM me on AIM
AIM: WeaZ8289
email: Weaz8289@yahoo.com

EnlightenedOne wrote:Lol maybe gus but not if im not informed before hand
Gpox jusy beat me 3 or 4 times consecutivly in 1v1's! its those damn core rushing units the zippers that arm has no decent counter for that got me i almost had a good force at one point but he arrived 30 seconds to early for two sentinels to come online and i lost. Goodluck with him!

2 or more missle towers is the hard counter to zippers...

yeah 3 preferably and u really need those 'MT' to be units so u can still expand

Min3mat wrote:yeah 3 preferably and u really need those 'MT' to be units so u can still expand

Jethro suck at killing zippers, they will get killed on a ratio of like 2 to 1, plus they cost more and have a higher build time then MT, and they monoplize the Kbot lab's time which is a major factor in the early game. Rocket Kbots work well, but they suck against air as fighters and gunships tend to dodge the slower moving, poor turnrate projectiles, and they also suffer from the same monoplization issue. Watch SJ or any of the best XTA players in replays, you will always see some MT.

Was thinking of having 1 spectator at every game.. to watch rules being followed (no rules!), and.. dunno..

but maybe its better we all get to see the replays from FU.

Be sure to rate it and comment it (and save it) before uploading.

naming convention could have the name of the group(color), the the round (er.. 1st round is this one?) and.. version :D, map and players?..

TOUR_Blue_1stR_EnligthenedOne_MOnG

suggestions?

i can only do weekends or possibly weednesdays with those times, (GMT - 5)

Forgot to mention, im GMT +10. Weekends are best, but I can do weekdays if I have to.

ERgh this better not be starting too sooon

As I just have exams starting... so im not gonna be able to play for most of november

last exam is 29th november... Well I could play this next weekend the 5th or 6th

But im +12 GMT oh wait with DST its +13

HULK BUMP! HULK BUMP PUNY HUMANS FOR BETTER ACESIBILTY AND PANCAKES!

Haha, it's bump, bumb could mean something entirely different.

Lack of sleep do bad things to brain. *fixed*

Anyway... WHERE IS OUR TOURNAMENT?!?

Its setting itself up and in the past 120 hours i have had 16 hours sleep so bare with me i will probably have it timed by the end of tommorow :) but i got abit busy this week

GMT + 1

E-mail: millebierg[AT]msn[DOT]com
Same address for MSN Messenger.

I'm not very good, but I do want to learn more.

mongus wrote:Was thinking of having 1 spectator at every game.. to
...
but maybe its better we all get to see the replays from FU.
...
naming convention ...
suggestions?

Having a spectator can cause suspicions. I've been acused before of having «a system» with my mates when spectating one of my PT mates. Anyway, not only because of suspicions, it is indeed possible to «cheat» through a spectator.

About uploading them, i was already thinking that it would be «mandatory».

My sugestion:
Host uploads it (to avoid duplication of files with people making mistakes as to whom should upload it)
Naming convention:
TournamentName.Date.Round.SectionColour.PlayerNumVsPlayerNum

Ex:
IT.5-11-2005.R1.Red.1Vs2

might aswell include modname and mapname so that they can be FUed and anybody can watch them just as any other replay...

PauloMorfeo wrote:

mongus wrote:Was thinking of having 1 spectator at every game.. to
...
but maybe its better we all get to see the replays from FU.
...
naming convention ...
suggestions?

Having a spectator can cause suspicions. I've been acused before of having «a system» with my mates when spectating one of my PT mates. Anyway, not only because of suspicions, it is indeed possible to «cheat» through a spectator.

About uploading them, i was already thinking that it would be «mandatory».

My sugestion:
Host uploads it (to avoid duplication of files with people making mistakes as to whom should upload it)
Naming convention:
TournamentName.Date.Round.SectionColour.PlayerNumVsPlayerNum

Ex:
IT.5-11-2005.R1.Red.1Vs2

A system like ventrillo?

erm with the replays just save it so in the comments section it says TOURNAMENT: Gpox vs Min3mat: gg i almost won Gpox laid down a half tonne of ownage etc