Page 4 of 4

Re: Elitism

Posted: 04 Oct 2011, 14:51
by 1v0ry_k1ng
Lolsquad_Steven wrote:Why not accept them as a part of this community and instead of trying to destroy what little this game has left just work around or with it.
what, smurfs? smurfing is faggotry and irl should have been prevented some time ago.

Re: Elitism

Posted: 05 Oct 2011, 04:38
by Neddie
PicassoCT wrote:How does binding people to one nick make them behave better?
No convincing, valid responses to this point have been made in the thread thus far.
Lolsquad_Steven wrote:Why not accept them as a part of this community and instead of trying to destroy what little this game has left just work around or with it.
Steven has a good point whether or not you agree about smurfs - we can work around or with that element. Too often discussions of problems with and improvements to be made to Spring come down to the same issues; smurfing, TA content, et al. I'd like to return to the earlier focus of the discussion if possible - the problem of elitism, which has little to nothing to do with smurfing and everything to do with community.

Re: Elitism

Posted: 05 Oct 2011, 11:25
by PicassoCT
Who started this idiotic discussion anyway?


Lets just make it a advertising. Like a chessworldmaster sitting in a retirement home on boardgame-evening or in a kindergarten... if you dont want to be rusty once strategy games get reborn and challenging again.
Youve got to train. It wont be nice. They will hate you. They will pick on you. But you can do it. Go Spring.

Re: Elitism

Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 12:23
by sillynanny
That could be funny. Something in the vein of Dwarf Fortress' "losing is fun".

Re: Elitism

Posted: 06 Oct 2011, 12:39
by ZodiacKiller
Bring the trolls back.