Re: Subforums for the larger mods
Posted: 15 Apr 2009, 17:58
There are free forum hosting setups.
Open Source Realtime Strategy Game Engine
https://springrts.com/phpbb/
Not going to happen. It was asked for several times, and never happened, so I see no reason it would go differently this time.Boirunner wrote:Subforums for the larger mods
It's pretty easy to get a criterion such as "any mod whose thread is over 5 page long and whose creator ask for a sub-forum", and stick to it.SwiftSpear wrote:I don't want to figure out who deserves a subforum and who doesn't.
Get off yo asses and post in this KP forum!. I feel lonely there.Otherside wrote:get off yo asses and make one
No, scattered we die, together we stand. Why are you talking about Penises? You're just throwing irrelevant obscene word to throw discredit over a sensible request.SwiftSpear wrote:Mods should really have their own hosting and communities anyways, the spring site isn't open to be used as an e-penis size contest.
There is. To gather all discussion about a mod on the same place, while being able to have more than one discussion at once concerning a mod. To not have repliers realise only after posting twice this isn't about BA.SwiftSpear wrote:There's no reason a mod should be doing anything here that requires a subforum.
Still not as convenient as a subforum per mod. If I want to see recent threads about a mod, I can't really, if a mod has ten times more discussion, it drowns out the other, and, well, basically, the whole forum software, the search box, the moderator system, etc.. was conceived by having in mind it would be used by creating subforums, not by using tags in thread names. Anyway, half the people will forget about putting [mods] tags in thread name, the other half will always spell it differently and the thread title will become less readable. So idea is maybe better than nothin, but much worse than proper subforum.Just make a forum that you can make multiple threads per mod, flagging them with [XTA] or [KP] or whatever.
Werewolf subforum ffs!1.) Moderator time. Will the effort of setting up the subforums and subforum moderators
To the contrary. Having mods confined to mere threads shows they are not worthy of consideration, that there is only one Spring game, which of course would be BA.so BA/CA/XTA/NOTA would get there own forums ?? that makes Spring look like TAspring again which is what the engine is trying to get away from.
EE.JAZCASH wrote:Until we have a solid mod to fall back onto, most players will sick with OTA mods.
I myself would like to scrap OTA and go onto something new but until there's actually something that isn't buggy, plays as well as OTA mods and is a complete replacement for OTA, I'm sticking with OTA.
1 post.
LEARN2PHPBBSwiftSpear wrote:The werewolf forum took like 30 minutes to set up.
There is really a demand, honest! Also, we don't need anything glorious. As a mod player (not mod creator), I would very much appreciate mod based subforums as I can participate in those discussions without creating yet another account (and checking yet another forum). I would personally love to see a subforum for P.U.R.E for instance, given that I only use the forum here at clan-sy.com to discuss that particular mod.SwiftSpear wrote: Forb is offering free hosting to games including thier own facepage and forums. Smoth offers forum space to games. Wouldn't you prefer forum space you can actually administrate?
If there's really a demand I can set up mod based subforums, but they're not going to be glorious.
SwiftSpear wrote:The werewolf forum took like 30 minutes to set up.
CS, L4D, and Source Engine are all subforums of the same forum!!Forboding Angel wrote:Should CS or L4D fans post rabidly on the Source Engine forums, of in their own communities?
Sounds cool. Keeping our fingers crossed!Forboding Angel wrote: Edit, I just thought of a solution, brb.
I'm willing to implement this. First I want to know if actual game representatives are legitimately interested, not counting people who have made 1 or 2 units for CA. It does take my time to set each forum up, so I want some indication that I'm not wasting my time.IllvilJa wrote:Personally, I think it makes sense to have a subforum which in return contains a number of "subsubforums", one per mod.
The point is exactly to separate modding discussion from player discussion (or "random crap" as you call it), for the mods that are big enough.smoth wrote: yep, I don't have a lot of noobs posting random crap! I also have very specific things covered. My site isn't for all the fuckwitts of the community, it is for a controlled environment for people to have a forum if they need one. So development can be discussed without all the stupid bullshit that is on this forum. to that point and purpose it has less activity.
QFTI just want the forum to be divided up more so we don't keep getting topics in places where they shouldn't be.
all discussion related to P.U.R.E that I read and is participating (to some minor extent, I admit) is exclusively on this forum
The whole point is that this rule is retarded. It makes reasonable discussion about any mod impossible. It defies the principle of an internet forum.
Having mutliple topics in one thread reduces a forum into a chat. It takes aways all structure, and forces a user wanting to know something to read through dozens of pages.
To the contrary. Having mods confined to mere threads shows they are not worthy of consideration, that there is only one Spring game, which of course would be BA.
I didn't want to create usergroups for subforums. The majority of our rights and privileges work is done through usergroups, and if there's enough of a crowd of them it makes nearly any forum administration a bigger hassle. To a degree, it's just going beyond the scope of phpbb3. If user groups had better organization and filters I'd be less apprehensive.SpliFF wrote:It's an offer I would take up once my mod has a player-base. It's premature to be asking your question now because most of the current mods have made other arrangements.
I'm not sure why you wouldn't give mod leaders moderation rights in their subforum. That seems to conflict with your whole "not being bothered" philosphy. A trusted and interested administrator in each subforum would reduce your workload. The alternative is being constantly hassled to do stickies, thread merging, moderation and cleanup. If the mod leader turns out to be a pain, or power-mad, or just lazy you reserve the right to boot their whole subforum. I don't see the problem.