Spring RTS Engine

rattle wrote:sucker punch, if you like dim witted action movies

KaiserJ wrote: looking for what?

Canadian Bacon

Black Swan
yeah hooray, a film about ballet or something, would never watch.
But after being forced to watch it, i think it was actually decent.
If you liked the theme (note: not the violence) of Fight Club you might find this interessting as well.

black swan has been recommended about 4 times now...

SPRING DRAMA ARISE

black swan vs predator

Jurassic Swan

knorke wrote:Jurassic Swan

"Shoot her! Shooooot her!"

Watched Raging Bull (1980). Good movie. Really well played. Nothing more to say.

SwiftSpear wrote:7 samurai is extremely slow. It's a relic from a past age of movie making long gone, greater than most from it's time, but not the action packed modern films we are used to. It's definitely good, but it might be a quite taxing if you aren't willing to slow down and enjoy it for what it is and have some patience in the slower parts.

Most retarded answer ever go watch die hard 4.

Taken (2008)

something like old jason bourne trying to save his dauther. pretty good movie (luc besson made screenplay, so)

taken? are you serious? i though rob roy, quigon, and batman's ghulio was bad, but this guy knows how to fuck up a movie.

lolwut, actually i think he was good in this one (in batman either, but i think his character/idea was fucked up since very beginning)

watched sucker punch and thor.

thor's plot was pretty typical for that kind of movies, sucker punch was pretty crazy. worth watching for the same reasons as 300 and such (violett is/always been hot also).

anyone seen priest ? is it rly so terrible as everyone say ?

I watched Caroline the second times yesterday,I admire the film mostly because it is good to look at. Selick is as unconventional in his imagery as Gaiman is in his writing, and this is a movie for people who know and care about drawing, caricature, grotesquerie and the far shores of storytelling. In short, you might care little about a fantasy, little indeed about this story, and still admire the artistry of it all, including an insidious score by Bruno Coulais, which doesn't pound at us like many horror scores, but gets under our psychic fingernails.

mark520 wrote:I watched Caroline the second times yesterday,I admire the film mostly because it is good to look at. Selick is as unconventional in his imagery as Gaiman is in his writing, and this is a movie for people who know and care about drawing, caricature, grotesquerie and the far shores of storytelling. In short, you might care little about a fantasy, little indeed about this story, and still admire the artistry of it all, including an insidious score by Bruno Coulais, which doesn't pound at us like many horror scores, but gets under our psychic fingernails.

Its awesome. Loved it. But please its Coraline !!!

bobthedinosaur wrote:taken? are you serious? i though rob roy, quigon, and batman's ghulio was bad, but this guy knows how to fuck up a movie.

What do you have against Liam Neeson?

i think u got bot'd mightyone...

NOT THIS TIME BOT

Taken wasn't a great revenge film, but not because of Liam Neeson. I rather liked his Ras Al Ghul.

Taken was a hundred cuts above the average hollywood thriller and liam neilson is both baller and excellent in the film. if you voice otherwise you are biased. rotten tomatoes (an average of the oppions of lots of good critics) agrees