Spring RTS Engine

shouldn't the donut guy go on the building?

@bob i added him after a while just for fun

@guess thx for the advice, so do u mean the playfield or the big ground? i made the playfield for the correct size



btw is it possible to animate/script modells for worldbuilder?

Of course. Most of the models have scripts, that do various things when they die.

okay seriously I need some decisive action for this models form.

V5 or v6?


or an older version http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.ph ... start=4048

I like v5, looks more aerodynamic.

v5

V4, imo. V5 looks utterly imbalanced and nose-heavy, which is a big no-no for an aircraft.

Argh wrote:a big no-no for an aircraft.

reactive armor on an aircraft...

v5 imo

I meant V5, vs. V6. That was confusing. My bad.

Agree with consensus - looks better with teh little tube-things on the back, where it's not front-heavy.

So, what's this gunship for?

bomber,
and transport

Got off my lazy ass for a second

bob:
Nice models you have there. Ever seen that german asymetrical VTOL from the WW2 era?

no, which one?

uh... I have no idea. Maybe it wasn't a VTOL after all and just a dive bomber. There were quite a few asymmetrical designs...

OKay, I went with a mix of like v3 and v5. I didn't like the idea of the weapon pylons being attached to engine pylons. thats just me tho.

I think it looks good. Keep going.

smoth wrote:I think it looks good. Keep going.

That, and also, move the wheels back possibly?

Really digging your unit design bob. Reminds me of some of the vehicles from this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6AAt-oV3wE

the offspring of an orca and an apache