Page 3 of 3
Posted: 27 Nov 2006, 22:25
by 1v0ry_k1ng
supcom dosnt look amazing. the graphics are terrible in terms of functionality. that is, to play the game you dont actually look att he graphics, as at a playble zoom all the units are specs. hence, SUPCOM LICKS KKTHX
Posted: 27 Nov 2006, 22:36
by Felix the Cat
And to think that I risked all sorts of personal insults and flames when I said that SupCom would suck three months ago.
Posted: 27 Nov 2006, 22:47
by AF
@swift
In 2004, the brittish government launched a hefty inquiry into one of these things, and their results? Andrex cant call their toilet paper the softest because it wasnt and had lost out to a no frills cheap ownbrand product by asda.
I guess things are lax in america, but some countries make a big deal out of these things.
Posted: 27 Nov 2006, 23:06
by 1v0ry_k1ng
it isnt the softest, so now it has puppies on the paper. what a great thought. wiping your ass on puppies. their unto a winner.
Posted: 27 Nov 2006, 23:09
by Lolsquad_Steven
TBH i like supcom, the way i've been playing it, it's really intense. But it still feels like strategic icon warz.
Posted: 27 Nov 2006, 23:39
by det
Forboding Angel wrote:BTW why do all those "good" players typically stick with spamming flash Tanks and Mavs?
I have had really good luck owning tank/mav-spammers using a nice combination of mavs/snipers/aa kbots with good micro to ensure only the mavs take fire.
Posted: 28 Nov 2006, 02:00
by MrNubyagi
discriminatingly banned by decimator