Page 3 of 3
Posted: 16 Oct 2006, 23:00
by rattle
Ask your president, he had the pleasure.
That's her.
Posted: 16 Oct 2006, 23:01
by Snipawolf
lol? I dun't know whether to laugh or sit here and think about that more..
Posted: 16 Oct 2006, 23:07
by Neddie
There is a MAD magazine joke where a photo of Bush giving her a back rub leads to her saying that as she didn't put out for Clinton, she wasn't going to for him.
Posted: 16 Oct 2006, 23:49
by Lindir The Green
KDR_11k wrote:If you're not going to vote for a major party anyway, why not pick a third party instead? Because your vote wouldn't make a difference? Well, there's probably thousands if not millions of people like you that don't like the major parties but don't vote for minor parties because it's "pointless"...
That's why we need the instant run-off system. Everywhere.
No more far left or far right people getting elected, just people in the middle who the many extremists rank at #2, and so when their #1 candidate is eliminated all their votes go to the middle.
Then even if we dissagreed with the person who was elected, that person would still most likely be sane and logical, unlike in many countries now.
Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 10:45
by KDR_11k
Machiosabre wrote:I'm not saying some people not voting because both parties suck accomplishes anything, but if enough people didn't vote the elections wouldn't count. That might shake things up a bit.
Considering how low the voter turnout in the US already is I don't think that approach is successful, you can always count on the extremists or habitual voters (that vote one party because they always did, no matter what happens) to vote. Get those non-voters to vote third party and you've suddently got a new party in power.
Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 15:52
by Caydr
Why do people even vote in the US? It's like, which way do you want to be raped... Either way, you're electing rich boys who have no clue about what the majority want, because they've never lived that life.
How do you even get on the ballot? Well, it takes money. Does the majority have money? No. So the two ways you have to get on the vote are to be rich at the start (anyone spring to mind?), or to become the lapdog of a bunch of corporate contributors that want to be richer. Regardless of who you pick, odds are you're going to get an assclown that spends the majority of his time on vacation. Democracy, my ass.
Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 19:08
by FizWizz
Caydr hadn't heard of Paul Wellstone, obviously.
The current Electoral College system of the US is a royally f*cked up way of doing things, and the fact that the United States, great baston of freedom and democracy, doesn't have elections by popular vote is just sick. There's my two cents.
Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 20:02
by Caydr
Yeah! Who the heck decided on that crap anyway? US stands for equality, but I guess some states are a little more equal than others, huh?
Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 20:04
by Machiosabre
well if we divided votes among people equally that would be communism

Posted: 17 Oct 2006, 21:39
by Hellspawn
Yeah I can vote and I also do vote.
My saying is, if you don't vote you aren't allowed to whine about the one who got voted <_<.