Page 3 of 17
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 01 Jul 2008, 22:58
by Machiosabre
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 01 Jul 2008, 23:29
by NOiZE
<3
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 02:19
by Acidd_UK
fixed

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 02:21
by Machiosabre
I will not be censored!
barnacles!
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 02:46
by el_matarife
So is there a list of Lua widgets included with BA so I can go remove all my local copies? (Since user widgets take precedent over mod widgets and I'd rather use whatever is the most up to date and bug free.)
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 03:27
by LordMatt
NOiZE wrote:Truths
In the same spirit dgun limit should not be usable for BA games.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 09:00
by Scratch
I've never heard as much hate towards BA as there is now. If they don't switch the autohosts to default towards the old way (where you can walk your com and lose it and still play) I will not be playing much anymore.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 09:53
by Pressure Line
Scratch wrote:I've never heard as much hate towards BA as there is now. If they don't switch the autohosts to default towards the old way (where you can walk your com and lose it and still play) I will not be playing much anymore.
buhu?
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 21:39
by NOiZE
Scratch wrote:I've never heard as much hate towards BA as there is now. If they don't switch the autohosts to default towards the old way (where you can walk your com and lose it and still play) I will not be playing much anymore.
Well @ least put it on the commander mode then (Your team loses when all commanders of a team die)
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 21:54
by Argh
YOU ARE THE COMMANDER
WHEN YOU DIE, YOU ARE OUT OF THE GAME
Splattering this on your loadscreens warrants a 6.32 in itself.
QFT. I'm 100% in favor of this, and tbh, I'm quite proud of NOiZE for standing up for good ol' hardcore play. Down with porcfest DSD games, up with Ashap! >_> <_< ...ok, so I'm probably the only one who likes Ashap, but meh, you get it...
Don't splatter on the loadscreen, though, splatter it on the game screen at start of that game type, it'd cause less confusion.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 22:03
by Sleksa
I'm probably the only one who likes Ashap
Along with anyone who's ever played ota outside "15 MIN NO RUSH" rules ~~
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 22:05
by Argh
Along with anyone who's ever played ota outside "15 MIN NO RUSH" rules ~~
Yeah, but frankly, I didn't think anybody of that description actually played Spring

Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 22:20
by Pxtl
Haven't tried it yet, but at this point it'd be nice to be able to move the "game ends" option into the modoptions list, just for consistency... although I'm sure that's probably hard-coded crap.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 22:26
by KDR_11k
yep, hardcoded, can't kill any of those options even if we don't want them.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 02 Jul 2008, 23:30
by smoth
Scratch wrote:I will not be playing much anymore.
and nothing of value was lost.
Things link dgun in start area, comm ends etc should all be moved to mod options. DOWN WITH HARDCODED SHIT!
Speaking of which the new econ needs a slider for it's starting resources... /me runs off to maek noets....
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 03 Jul 2008, 01:05
by sillynanny
In my opinion if the units dont blow its not comms ends. If its not comms ends, it might as well be comm continues and keep it simple.
I agree that it should be played c. ends. What i dont agree is that losing one player's stuff ends the game. Well at least not in the maps i see played most. Don't be sissies and play pure ends.
In this setup, one ends up taking out a weak player's comm and having a strong player take his stuff... a net loss for the attacker.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 03 Jul 2008, 01:08
by caldera
since i run springie with ba 6.31 it doesnt work anymore, it keeps hanging on Loading LuaRules. I stilll can start 6.31 over tasclient though. Anybody who has this problem too or any suggestions?
thank you
OberstKlink (who wants to bring stalag13 back to life...)
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 03 Jul 2008, 03:53
by LordMatt
Do you have the latest springie?
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 03 Jul 2008, 10:07
by KDR_11k
sillynanny wrote:In my opinion if the units dont blow its not comms ends. If its not comms ends, it might as well be comm continues and keep it simple.
I agree that it should be played c. ends. What i dont agree is that losing one player's stuff ends the game. Well at least not in the maps i see played most. Don't be sissies and play pure ends.
In this setup, one ends up taking out a weak player's comm and having a strong player take his stuff... a net loss for the attacker.
Stuff explodes when the last com falls, pure com end punishes teams that work together and rely on each other because they would lose one of their functions in their team while a disorganized team where everyone does his own thing wouldn't lose much. With com control they lose one player and are one com closer to elimination but don't lose a part of their economy/base/etc.
Re: Balanced Annihilation V6.31
Posted: 03 Jul 2008, 11:37
by Acidd_UK
Im not convinced by com control, I prefer regular com (all coms on ally dead = game over). My issue is that in a big team game, if you trade early on for whatever reason, you're out of the game and someone else gets your eco, factory etc. To me, this is a big pile of suck and makes the early game potentially really ghey. Imagine 2 coms both rush for the middle. If the enemy com refuses to fall back then your only option can be to trade (fall back and lose ground). But if you trade, then two players are out of teh game in the first few mins even tho their bases/eco are still all there. I don't like it. The only solutions I can think of are realy artifical and horrible and reduce to the unworkable anti-greifing strats proposed elsewhere. So I think com is a much better mode to be default for large team games...