Page 3 of 5

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 19:31
by smoth
I don't care about that gmn, You can look at it all you want. I just don't want to hear the whining when I update gundam and people's mutators are broken.

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 19:37
by Guessmyname
Can't they just update the mutators?

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 19:45
by Neddie
Guessmyname wrote:Can't they just update the mutators?
They could, yes, but the point is that it would be easier for them to complain, thus, with a negative outlook on humanity you could assume that they would complain.

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 19:50
by smoth
they could, but balance changes etc may have magnified results in what they were doing

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 20:47
by KDR_11k
Look at the changes between 1.1 and 1.11. Gundam isn't like BA in that new versions just refine the balance in an otherwise feature-complete mod, Gundam is still getting new features added with serious implications for the gameplay.

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 21:20
by Guessmyname
Point taken

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 21:40
by CautionToTheWind
KingRaptor wrote:
MR.D wrote:mistake was made
Taking TRO's stuff after being specifically told "no" and then deliberately antagonizing and flaming other users is not what most people would call just a "mistake".
Of course its not a mistake. If he ends up making something good with it and giving it to the world, how could it be a mistake?

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 21:48
by TheRegisteredOne
CautionToTheWind wrote:
KingRaptor wrote:
MR.D wrote:mistake was made
Taking TRO's stuff after being specifically told "no" and then deliberately antagonizing and flaming other users is not what most people would call just a "mistake".
Of course its not a mistake. If he ends up making something good with it and giving it to the world, how could it be a mistake?
And the content creator gets none of the credit.

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 21:50
by KDR_11k
CautionToTheWind wrote:Of course its not a mistake. If he ends up making something good with it and giving it to the world, how could it be a mistake?
So you think that as long as the result is good in someone's oppinion it's justified to be a total asshole and take things you have no right to?

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 21:52
by Neddie
Ahem. If we could be a little more civil, lads?

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 22:20
by Guessmyname
Neddie, this is Spring. Spring is an RTS - it's only natural for it's users to start wars!

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 22:23
by Neddie
Guessmyname wrote:Neddie, this is Spring. Spring is an RTS - it's only natural for it's users to start wars!
Be that as it may, we have a place for engagements, battles, skirmishes and all-out wars. We call it the Battle Screen.

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 22:26
by Klopper
YES, BIG SPRING BATTLE TIREDISTS VS ANTI-TIREDISTS PLZ :D

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 22:27
by TheRegisteredOne
Klopper wrote:YES, BIG SPRING BATTLE TRORISTS VS ANTI-TRORISTS PLZ :D
fixed :P

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 22:29
by Klopper
WHATEVER, ONLY THING THAT COUNTS IS THAT THERE IS A BIG SPRING BATTLE :D
Neddie is quite right, why have forum drama and flamewars when we have the means for epic battle with nukes, bombers and bald robotic men with fireball-of-death-shooting guns :D

edit: lol i'd really love to host it as a fun special event :D but sadly i'm behind a strange router so i can't :(

Posted: 20 Sep 2007, 22:51
by Guessmyname
Yes! We have ritual (and possibly literal depending on the mod) flamewars in Spring instead!

Posted: 21 Sep 2007, 00:18
by Felix the Cat
tombom wrote:Legally, they're both just as bad. From a normal perspective, I think the TRO was completely stupid not to allow Tired to use his model when he asked politely. )
So essentially, if I make a cool model and a total asshole asks nicely to use it, I'm obliged to give him my blessing?

That's an interesting way of interpreting who has priority in terms of where, how, and by whom an artist's work is used.

Posted: 21 Sep 2007, 00:21
by Saktoth
KDR_11k wrote:Leaving aside the legality and morality, Tired has chosen to act like an ass and should be treated accordingly.
QFT. Forget copyright, when someone told tired he couldnt play with their toy he threw a tantrum. Thats all this is about. He needs to sit on the naughty chair for a while.

Posted: 21 Sep 2007, 01:50
by REVENGE
Saktoth wrote:
KDR_11k wrote:Leaving aside the legality and morality, Tired has chosen to act like an ass and should be treated accordingly.
QFT. Forget copyright, when someone told tired he couldnt play with their toy he threw a tantrum. Thats all this is about. He needs to sit on the naughty chair for a while.
Internet does not have/nor need naughty chair. :wink:


Internet has kickban with suckass moderators, tbh.

Posted: 21 Sep 2007, 04:02
by MR.D
Klopper wrote:YES, BIG SPRING BATTLE TIREDISTS VS ANTI-TIREDISTS PLZ :D
I get Tired on my team :P