Spring RTS Engine

zwzsg wrote:I accidentally fell upon: http://www.heartless-bitches.com/rants/ ... s/ng.shtml

smoth wrote:

Gota wrote:What im saying is that there is no loyalty for the sake of loyalty.

People are not penguins, we do not get some kind of need "to be with one another." We choose to.

Gota wrote:We in many cases can suffer someone just cause we, at that specifi moment, have nobody to repalce him with and do not want to break the habit of being with that person or do not want ot be alone etc..

The fact that you look at someone as suffering them tells me you cannot love. Period. You cannot consider the other person beyond your OWN needs, you are entirely self serving. It is not unusual, there are people who simply REQUIRE direction or nudging, you are one of them. Your perspective on games is similar, unless the game has a required parameter you feel there is a lack of direction. Not saying I entirely understand you but that personality trait, the need for a clearly defined direction is one I have seen before. Just a personality I guess.

Why listen to a song, or watch a sunset? Some people need external reasons others do not. There are people in this world who will climb a mountain because they want to see the other side and people who will climb it because what they want is on the other side. You are the later I am the former we will not see eye to eye.

So I want to end this sub-discussion on this note: Just because you think something doesn't make it an absolute. That is kinda the point of this thread showing other perspectives on a viewpoint. I think it is nice that you have such a clearly defined perspective and there may be others including women who can get into an entirely pragmatic relationship. That is PERFECTLY OK but do not say that it is the only way to view the world.

Machete234 wrote:If he has technical understanding he could built a pc for 1/3 of the money his mac costs.
The mac products are mere design products how can somebody who knows about computers buy that?

SinbadEV wrote: so I think the term we're looking for is "Yuppie".

Its not insulting enough even though its from the 80's. (gayest decade ever)

smoth wrote:

Gota wrote:What im saying is that there is no loyalty for the sake of loyalty.

People are not penguins, we do not get some kind of need "to be with one another." We choose to.

Gota wrote:We in many cases can suffer someone just cause we, at that specifi moment, have nobody to repalce him with and do not want to break the habit of being with that person or do not want ot be alone etc..

The fact that you look at someone as suffering them tells me you cannot love. Period. You cannot consider the other person beyond your OWN needs, you are entirely self serving. It is not unusual, there are people who simply REQUIRE direction or nudging, you are one of them.

Your perspective on games is similar, unless the game has a required parameter you feel there is a lack of direction. Not saying I entirely understand you but that personality trait, the need for a clearly defined direction is one I have seen before. Just a personality I guess.

1. its far away from city or any street lights or buildings
2. its very, very dark,
3. you're walking there using just a weak red flashlight to avoid exposing the eyes.
4. its quite cold and windy,
5. we did go through a forest (dark like in a cave),
6. passed by several unfinished buildings (abandoned 'cause of recession),
7. it is on the beach and sea is loud and nobody could hear you scream; hell even if sea was silent nobody could hear you scream anyway 'cause of first bullet point, but the loudness does make it quite obvious.

TradeMark wrote:Wait a second... now its about computer geeks... this thread is funny

SinbadEV wrote: First: I have no idea why my brother in law buys macs other then they are pretty and fit the decor of his house..

Gota wrote:Dize!!!
I actually wanted your thingy to go the other way!!no gameplay just floating around to the music and having "portals" that u can go into and than youd enter like a "Sliders" tunnel that also moves to the rhythm and emerged in a place that uses a different visualization instead of you having to change them manually.

basically I wanted a full Aesthetic eye candy joy ride without interruptions and as much eye candy as possible in different combinations and sizes etc.

dizekat wrote:

Gota wrote:Dize!!!
I actually wanted your thingy to go the other way!!no gameplay just floating around to the music and having "portals" that u can go into and than youd enter like a "Sliders" tunnel that also moves to the rhythm and emerged in a place that uses a different visualization instead of you having to change them manually.

basically I wanted a full Aesthetic eye candy joy ride without interruptions and as much eye candy as possible in different combinations and sizes etc.

hehe well i were agreeing with smoth in general then. A few people expressed sentiments how my game doesn't have any point (the primary critique tbh, its kind of amusing that user review score are 8.5 to 9.5 /10 while critic review scores are around 7/10 , well coz critics really want direction so that they just get done with game asap and can be done with the review).
By the way, you can set difficulty to none for that, then click 'restart game'. No enemies will spawn. And enemies are the only un-eye-candy object there.

Gota wrote:

dizekat wrote:

Gota wrote:Dize!!!
I actually wanted your thingy to go the other way!!no gameplay just floating around to the music and having "portals" that u can go into and than youd enter like a "Sliders" tunnel that also moves to the rhythm and emerged in a place that uses a different visualization instead of you having to change them manually.

basically I wanted a full Aesthetic eye candy joy ride without interruptions and as much eye candy as possible in different combinations and sizes etc.

hehe well i were agreeing with smoth in general then. A few people expressed sentiments how my game doesn't have any point (the primary critique tbh, its kind of amusing that user review score are 8.5 to 9.5 /10 while critic review scores are around 7/10 , well coz critics really want direction so that they just get done with game asap and can be done with the review).
By the way, you can set difficulty to none for that, then click 'restart game'. No enemies will spawn. And enemies are the only un-eye-candy object there.

Yeah i know.I did that.but wormholes to different visualizations would be awesome :)

bobthedinosaur wrote:Legit question here, what is 'evil'?