Page 2 of 2
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 14:00
by SpikedHelmet
What the hell does letting a sex offender go have to do with socialism, other than in your radically ignorant mind?
I mentioned pedophilia because I've been hearing a LOT of instances of high-profile white supremacists being arrested for sex crimes, particularly with minors.
Are you saying that only "ultra-conservatives" of the "far right" should have a problem with paedophilia?
No, he's saying that my original comment that Nazis are pedophiles is nonsensical because historically they treat sex offenders the harshest.
Although that's not really true. The entire German army went on a raping spree throughout Europe, and I wouldn't be surprised if not a single German soldier was tried and convicted (to say nothing about punished) for a single case.
And FA, for future reference, you're a dumb, thick piece of shit who wouldn't know socialism if I came up and raped you.
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 14:04
by FLOZi
Raping and pillaging in war is nothing new...
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 14:04
by Comp1337
SpikedHelmet wrote:And FA, for future reference, you're a dumb, thick piece of shit who wouldn't know socialism if I came up and raped you.
Oh here we go. POLITIX ON INTARWEB == NONO
For some reason i found Spikeds flame hilarious.
EDIT: a phail is your flames spiked.
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 14:56
by PicassoCT
Fanger wrote:I think this thread is heading into EPIC FAIL land...
Just heading there ? Fanger, come on - we were half through that Place when the word communist & Nazi appeared :)
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 15:42
by Relative
I think this thread needs to be killed right now before it spirals out of control.
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 18:13
by rattle
Lock them up and they'll grind the bars with pedo-files...
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 18:38
by j5mello
rattle wrote:Lock them up and they'll grind the bars with pedo-files...
ill admit... i loled

Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 18:44
by Neddie
This thread is an utter failure. It begins with a biased and controversial collection of points, relating the existance of unregulated websites for the identification of individuals, a fundamental invasion of privacy for which you must prove cause and justification as a relatively moral person. None of these sites are checked, and thus, there is no way to confirm that they do not simply act in some cases as either distributors of slander or wrongful accusations for gain.
It then proceeds through a conflict of sensationalist associations and written reactions. Mal-formed points fly like tears from the eyes of one who has evicerated one too many onions, and then we enter into direct flames.
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 21:10
by Relative
neddiedrow wrote:This thread is an utter failure. It begins with a biased and controversial collection of points, relating the existance of unregulated websites for the identification of individuals, a fundamental invasion of privacy for which you must prove cause and justification as a relatively moral person. None of these sites are checked, and thus, there is no way to confirm that they do not simply act in some cases as either distributors of slander or wrongful accusations for gain.
It then proceeds through a conflict of sensationalist associations and written reactions. Mal-formed points fly like tears from the eyes of one who has evicerated one too many onions, and then we enter into direct flames.
+100
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 21:13
by Machiosabre
We can still save it! somebody post some naked ladies!
Posted: 07 Apr 2007, 21:36
by Decimator
I'll save it. Neddie explained this far better than I ever could.
Locked.