Page 2 of 2

Posted: 03 Jun 2005, 15:21
by aGorm
Some people are so slow...

aGorm

Posted: 03 Jun 2005, 17:03
by emmanuel
so winme work the same spring.exe than for windows ?
oh ... it s windows that is an emulator of winme then !!!
really winme can work all *.exe ????
if that i want use it
a freeware system isn t ?(or nomoneyware ?){or gratisware}[or no100bucksware?]

Posted: 03 Jun 2005, 17:47
by SinbadEV
Uhm... no... WINE is basically redirects api calls from an exe in linux to a full windows install on the same machine... thereby running the program with windows... somwthing like that... there is currently a group working on making a linux native version which would then, yes, be completely free

Posted: 04 Jun 2005, 01:04
by emmanuel
euh...what for use wine if windows is required ?
oh yes wine is a linux emulator !
but not use for a client it s only for server help?!

when come this great release full linux free ????

Posted: 04 Jun 2005, 10:15
by Tobi
http://www.winehq.org said:
Wine is an Open Source implementation of the Windows API on top of X and Unix.

Think of Wine as a compatibility layer for running Windows programs. Wine does not require Microsoft Windows, as it is a completely free alternative implementation of the Windows API consisting of 100% non-Microsoft code, however Wine can optionally use native Windows DLLs if they are available.
I keep quoting their HQ, so emmanuel, why don't you take a look there (http://www.winehq.org)?

Posted: 05 Jun 2005, 04:19
by PauloMorfeo
[K.B.] Napalm Cobra wrote:...
Wine Is Not an Emulator. ...
emmanuel wrote:what is wine so ?
Theoreticaly, WINE is not an emulator as it's name says. But in most practical senses, you can think of it as an emulator.
SinbadEV wrote:Uhm... no... WINE is basically redirects api calls from an exe in linux to a full windows install on the same machine... thereby running the program with windows...
Well, this information is wrong.
You can think of WINE as a translator. Similar to an Emulator.
What WINE does, if i know correctly, is, whenever the application that is beeing run by WINE requests access to something (like access to a file or to a function in DirectX), the WINE translates it into a comand suitable to run on Linux. This process is faster than Emulation and that is why they stress so much that they are not doing emulation.

So, to clear doubts, you only need the WINE instalation and you will be able to run Windows executables (i've installed the Microsoft Office on Linux once :twisted: ). Many Linux distributions now install by default WINE. (i remember Mandriva, the former Mandrake)

As you know, DirectX is a Windows only thing. And that is the source of most problems of WINE. Sometimes, calls to DirectX functions are not correctly interpreted. This is a problem mostly for games.
As alternatives, you have Cedega(i think this is the name). It is basicaly a comercial ($) version of WINE with much work puted in into making games work properly.

With the quality of many Linux distributions (and they're price :wink:), if any of you are still using Win98 (or lower, doh...), Linux is well worth at least checking out. If we can start a war here about which is better, Linuxes or WinXP, no one will tell you that Win98 is better than today's Linuxes!

Posted: 05 Jun 2005, 17:30
by emmanuel
for write short :
it s not time to use linux(wine or others) for work all games
isn t ?

Posted: 05 Jun 2005, 17:36
by emmanuel
Wine Features
Binary Compatibility

* Loads Windows 9x/NT/2000/XP, Windows 3.x and DOS programs and libraries
...
Graphics
...
* DirectX support for games (limited Direct3D support)
...

nocomment !