Page 2 of 2

Posted: 15 Jan 2007, 22:04
by pintle
RE: original topic, first-person camera your krog. Its great fun

Posted: 15 Jan 2007, 23:44
by manored
Cabbage wrote:No, things like tremors, merls, bombers etc are best when an enemy has heavy defences.


Or skill..
It depends of the situation. Bombers can be defeated by AA, artilary can be defeated by radar jammers, more artilary or just by a direct assault

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 01:02
by Cabbage
umm no, bombers will work, as he wont have any AA infront of his defences. You might lose them, but thats besides the point, they'll still work. And If radar jamming stops you from attacking, you need to learn to scout and use force fire.

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 03:37
by manored
But he may have among and behind them, and even if it works its useless if you lose too many aircraft for too few damage (unleash, of course, or economy is much stronger that his one). Scout and force fire its extremely inneficient compared to radar detection (but ok it works :-) ).

Anyway I have a new idea of how you should proceed:

Use bombers, if the enemy haves aa, use artilary, if he haves aa and artilary (its pretty hard to set up artilary if you are already under fire yourself), nuke im :-) , if he haves aa, artilary and anti-nuke defense, send Krogoths, if he haves aa, artilary, anti-nuke defense and more Krogoths, give up :-) .

Anyone agrees? :-)

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 20:01
by Cabbage
....

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 20:50
by Comp1337
manored wrote:But he may have among and behind them, and even if it works its useless if you lose too many aircraft for too few damage (unleash, of course, or economy is much stronger that his one). Scout and force fire its extremely inneficient compared to radar detection (but ok it works :-) ).

Anyway I have a new idea of how you should proceed:

Use bombers, if the enemy haves aa, use artilary, if he haves aa and artilary (its pretty hard to set up artilary if you are already under fire yourself), nuke im :-) , if he haves aa, artilary and anti-nuke defense, send Krogoths, if he haves aa, artilary, anti-nuke defense and more Krogoths, give up :-) .

Anyone agrees? :-)
U R NOT SMHERO
while(I_WIN == false)
{
SPAEM_KROG();
}

MEENS NEVAR GIVE UP

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 20:56
by manored
Comp1337 wrote:
manored wrote:But he may have among and behind them, and even if it works its useless if you lose too many aircraft for too few damage (unleash, of course, or economy is much stronger that his one). Scout and force fire its extremely inneficient compared to radar detection (but ok it works :-) ).

Anyway I have a new idea of how you should proceed:

Use bombers, if the enemy haves aa, use artilary, if he haves aa and artilary (its pretty hard to set up artilary if you are already under fire yourself), nuke im :-) , if he haves aa, artilary and anti-nuke defense, send Krogoths, if he haves aa, artilary, anti-nuke defense and more Krogoths, give up :-) .

Anyone agrees? :-)
U R NOT SMHERO
while(I_WIN == false)
{
SPAEM_KROG();
}

MEENS NEVAR GIVE UP
Did you tried to break some typing speed record then you wrote this? :lol:

The giving up part as actual a joke :-) ... But Its not the less rational decision in that situation :-) .

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 21:29
by Comp1337
manored wrote:
Comp1337 wrote:
manored wrote:But he may have among and behind them, and even if it works its useless if you lose too many aircraft for too few damage (unleash, of course, or economy is much stronger that his one). Scout and force fire its extremely inneficient compared to radar detection (but ok it works :-) ).

Anyway I have a new idea of how you should proceed:

Use bombers, if the enemy haves aa, use artilary, if he haves aa and artilary (its pretty hard to set up artilary if you are already under fire yourself), nuke im :-) , if he haves aa, artilary and anti-nuke defense, send Krogoths, if he haves aa, artilary, anti-nuke defense and more Krogoths, give up :-) .

Anyone agrees? :-)
U R NOT SMHERO
while(I_WIN == false)
{
SPAEM_KROG();
}

MEENS NEVAR GIVE UP
Did you tried to break some typing speed record then you wrote this? :lol:

The giving up part as actual a joke :-) ... But Its not the less rational decision in that situation :-) .
I RITES LIKE THIS GRAMAR IS 4 NOBBZ

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 21:51
by manored
My brother thinks like that... and now he calls my help each time he needs to read a text in english... :-)

Posted: 16 Jan 2007, 22:17
by Comp1337
And he plays speedmetal?

Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 19:29
by manored
He doesnt even plays this game :-) ...

And just had a online game where I made 2 Krogs and they onyed completly and succefull eliminated ever single anti-krog tough of my mind... :-)

Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 21:05
by rattle
You deserve a prize of some sort.

Posted: 18 Jan 2007, 22:18
by manored
For reconizing that krogs are great or that its some sort of sarcasm where you are telling me that I am priding myself too much? :-)